注册 登录
滑铁卢中文论坛 返回首页

风萧萧的个人空间 http://www.kwcg.ca/bbs/?61910 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

日志

英国为何选择中国 你绝对想不到美国做了什么

已有 6 次阅读2026-2-22 13:56 |个人分类:Cyrus Janssen

英国为何选择中国(你绝对想不到美国做了什么)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIUrrXbBsy4

Cyrus Janssen 2026年2月2日

尽管面临来自华盛顿日益增长的压力以及唐纳德·特朗普的再次警告,英国还是与中国签署了一项重要的全新贸易协议。在这段视频中,我将分析英国做出这一举动的原因、该协议的真正意义,以及它如何预示着美国最亲密的盟友之间正在发生更大的转变。 
???? 了解更多投资矿业未来的信息:https://vanguardminingcorp.com/

???? 点击此处查看 Vanguard Mining 投资者演示文稿:https://vanguardminingcorp.com/invest...
???? 股票代码:CSE: UUU I OTC: UUUFF
???? 完整免责声明:https://docs.google.com/document/d/12...
???? 视频来源:https://www.itv.com/news/2026-01-31/k... https://www.reuters.com/business/heal... https://open.substack.com/pub/keirsta... https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0k... https://traditional.leidenranking.com... https://traditional.leidenranking.com... https://www.goldstandardir.com/UUUSou...

合格人士:本文件中包含的科学和技术信息本新闻稿已由J. T. Shearer先生(理学硕士、注册地质学家、注册地质学家(卑诗省和安大略省))审阅并批准。Shearer先生是一位咨询地质学家,符合加拿大国家矿业项目信息披露标准43-101号规范(简称“NI 43-101”)中“合格人士”的定义。Shearer先生与Vanguard Mining公司并非独立关联方。合格人士2:本新闻稿中包含的科学和技术信息已由Lawrence Segerstrom先生(注册地质学家、理学硕士、工商管理硕士)审阅并批准。Segerstrom先生是一位咨询地质学家,符合加拿大国家矿业项目信息披露标准43-101号规范(简称“NI 43-101”)中“合格人士”的定义。Segerstrom先生与Vanguard Mining公司并非独立关联方,因此不属于NI 43-101意义上的独立人士。

00:00 - 美国盟友为何转向中国
00:50 - 全球秩序如何崩溃
01:51 - 特朗普的关税政策奏效了吗?
02:20 - 中国的世界目标
03:00 - 英中贸易协议
05:29 - 中国对英国构成威胁吗?
07:48 - 为什么中国代表未来
08:33 - 英国媒体的变迁
10:32 - Vanguard Mining 的赞助商

美国盟友为何转向中国

如果我告诉你,当前全球政治格局最大的转变并非源于战争,而是悄然发生,美国最亲密的盟友正在远离美国,转向中国,你会作何感想?人们常说,一图胜千言。这件事至关重要。因为仅在2026年1月,就有不少于六个美国最亲密的盟友,包括法国、韩国、爱尔兰、加拿大、芬兰,以及现在的英国,派遣了他们的国家领导人直接前往北京,与中国签署了创纪录的新贸易协议。所有这一切都在尽管唐纳德·特朗普公开威胁任何选择与北京走近的国家都将面临更多关税、更多贸易战和经济惩罚。那么,显而易见的问题是,为什么会发生这种情况?

为什么美国最亲密的盟友现在愿意冒着被华盛顿报复的风险,转向中国?全球秩序究竟是如何崩溃的?

答案并不简单。但要真正理解这种转变对全球权力未来意味着什么,我们需要回到2023年9月,当时时任国务卿安东尼·布林金发表了一番极具启发性的言论。

这有助于解释我们目前所目睹的一切。当北京和莫斯科等国家试图重写或摧毁多国体系的支柱时,当他们错误地声称秩序的存在仅仅是为了推进西方的利益而牺牲其他国家的利益时,越来越多的国家和人民将会站出来,发出反对的声音。你看,布林肯试图警告我们,只有像中国和俄罗斯这样的国家才会公开宣布基于规则的国际秩序已经失效。然而仅仅28个月后,令人惊讶的是,加拿大——美国最亲密、最重要的贸易伙伴——在瑞士达沃斯世界经济论坛上承认了这个被禁止的真相。马克·卡尼演讲中有一句话我至今记忆犹新:“我们正处于断裂之中,而非过渡之中。”

当我向你们解释这项新的英中贸易协定时,你们就会明白事情变化有多快。特朗普的关税政策奏效了吗?

众所周知,关税一直是特朗普最喜欢用来对世界各国施加美国武力和影响力的手段。在达沃斯论坛召开前,特朗普威胁欧洲盟友,如果他们阻挠美国获得进入格陵兰岛的通道,将加征关税。特朗普站在台上,实际上是向全世界宣布:“我们掌控着这个体系,你们必须听我们的话,但到了2026年,没人会再相信这套说辞了。”正如卡尼首相所解释的那样,种种迹象表明,美国霸权主义已经过时了,苏联的解体就是明证。

现在中国的世界目标

让我们对比一下中国政府传递的信息当中国副总理香在演讲开场时说道:“我非常高兴来到美丽的达沃斯,参加以对话精神为主题的世界经济论坛年会。现在正是我们彼此倾听、互相学习、建立更牢固互信的良机。”

这一信息在达沃斯与会者中引起了强烈的共鸣。中国副总理随后进一步阐述,中国希望通过搭建桥梁而非筑起高墙,构建互利共赢、包容性的全球化经济,并拥抱多边主义,认为这是维护国际秩序稳定的正确途径。英国政府听到了这一信息,并采取了具有里程碑意义的举措,与中国签署了迄今为止最重要的贸易协议。

《英中贸易协议》首相斯塔默在X日自豪地宣布了这项协议的成功,他表示:“我说过,我此次访华将为英国人民带来实实在在的好处。我说到做到。我们现在已经为英国争取到了价值数十亿英镑的出口和投资协议。这就是我来这里为你们带来实实在在好处的原因。”

当然,别误会,英国首相因为向中国靠拢而受到国内外的诸多批评。但当你看到这些数字以及在此次会晤期间达成的协议时,就会发现这对英国来说将是一次重大胜利。中国汽车制造商Cherry宣布将在利物浦设立其欧洲总部,当地政府在X日宣布,这是近年来该市制造业最重要的项目之一。

全球最大的制药公司之一阿斯特罗尼卡(Astroenica)达成了一项价值185亿美元的协议,从中国获得一种减肥药的授权,并承诺到2030年在中国投资150亿美元,以扩大药品生产和研发规模。中国经济规模庞大,举足轻重,不容忽视。在一个美国试图对所有商品加征关税并实现国内生产的世界里,那些能够达成贸易协议的国家最终将胜出。

以英国威士忌行业为例。斯塔默成功与中国谈判,将关税降低了50%,预计未来五年将为英国经济带来2.5亿英镑的收益。最终,两国还就所有英国公民免签赴华旅行达成协议,为更多英国游客打开了大门。两国之间甚至还有文化交流。总部位于布里斯托尔的世界斯诺克巡回赛成功在中国两个城市举办了一场价值超过1500万英镑的新赛事。与此同时,热门玩具乐宝的制造商PopMart承诺在英国开设七家门店,其中包括位于伦敦牛津街的旗舰店。

总的来说,斯塔默为期四天的中国之行促成了价值22亿英镑的出口协议,并在未来五年内获得了价值23亿英镑的市场准入,以及数亿英镑的中国企业投资。尽管双方在这次谈判中都取得了显而易见的贸易协议胜利,但特朗普立即抨击了这项新的贸易协议,并表示与中国做生意非常危险。

但我想和你们分享一段视频,我认为它能真正清晰地阐明目前的局势。请听听中国著名国际关系专家高维德是如何回答英国媒体提出的尖锐问题的。中国对英国构成威胁吗?

你是竞争对手吗?你是盟友吗?你是威胁吗?你如何看待你与英国的关系?首先,就中英关系而言,从中国的角度来看,英国不是竞争对手,也不是敌人,更不是敌对势力。

英国只是一个重要的国家,我们应该和平相处,友好互利。至于英国如何看待中国,这取决于英国政府和人民。但我认为,英国将中国视为敌人、对手或竞争对手是完全错误的。中英在什么方面存在竞争?

中国是最大的汽车生产国。与英国竞争?不。中国是最大的电动汽车出口国,并将引领全球电动汽车生产。英国是竞争对手吗?不是。中国很快将成为半导体领域最大、最重要的生产国和研发国。这是否意味着中国与英国竞争?不是。中国将成为人工智能革命的领军国家。英国是竞争对手吗?不是。所以我认为英国政府不应该高估自身在全球舞台上的影响力,也不应该将英国视为中国的竞争对手。中国不是竞争对手。中国是一个事实。

中国是英国必须面对和适应的巨大趋势。让我们追求和平,而不是挑起战争。说实话,很难找到比这段视频更好的片段,它能客观地展现中国决策者和大多数中国民众是如何看待当前全球局势的。注意英国采访者是如何以非常西方的视角开场的。

嗯。中国是什么?你是朋友、对手还是竞争对手?英国应该如何看待你?但维克多·高,他最初因担任邓小平的翻译而声名鹊起,邓小平是上世纪80年代将中国推向世界的中国领导人,他直截了当地拨开迷雾。他的回答简单而令人信服。我们不是你们的对手或竞争对手,只是一个你们应该与之开展业务的重要国家。维克多在这里提出了一个很少公开提及但绝对至关重要的观点。只有当双方在同一行业中争夺领导地位​​时,才存在竞争。

所以真正的问题是:英国如今在哪些行业真正领先于中国?令人不安的事实是没有。我们现在已经到了这样一个地步:如果你未来不与中国合作,就等于主动选择落后。

为了更深入地说明这一点,我想重点介绍社交媒体上流传的一个引人入胜的趋势。人们将自己2016年和2026年的照片进行比较,惊讶于短短十年间发生的巨大变化。那么,让我们把同样的视角应用到中国。看看这份基于世界大学排名的2016年数据。十年前,只有三所中国大学跻身全球前20强。但快进到2026年,中国大学占据了前20名中的16个席位。这不是缓慢的转变,而是结构性的变革,而且这一切仅仅发生在十年之内。但要了解这对英国政府来说意味着什么,你需要看看英国媒体内部发生了多么巨大的变化。看看这段视频,它三天前刚刚发布在BBC官方YouTube频道上,标题是不久前还难以想象的:中国正在
掌控全球力量的未来。

在这段YouTube视频中,BBC驻华记者没有故作姿态,也没有含糊其辞。她只是直截了当地阐述了中国如今在世界上的地位。这里是世界工厂,是世界上最大的制造商。如果你展望我们星球的未来,中国在可再生能源领域处于领先地位。

它生产了大约60%到80%的电动汽车、太阳能电池板、风力涡轮机和电池。中国制造的机器人比世界上任何其他地方都多。

中国拥有并加工的稀土比世界上任何其他地方都多。例如,大约90%的稀土都产自中国。这些提取物,这些矿物质,是制造从电动汽车到智能手机再到蓝牙音箱等各种产品所必需的。所以,谈到未来科技,谈到我们已经习以为常的那些东西,中国确实至关重要,这也是众多国家涌向中国的原因之一。

这些并非耸人听闻的观点,而是冷冰冰的客观事实。但值得注意的是,BBC 对中国的报道转变之快。
回顾五年前,BBC 发表了一篇题为《中国虚假信息传播中的外国人》的文章,指责包括我在内的一些外国 YouTuber 是恶意的中国宣传者。

但经过过去12个月的地缘政治格局重组,各国政府、企业乃至西方媒体自身都适应了现实,结果证明,我们根本就不是宣传者。我们只是走在了前面。我们报道的,早在公开谈论这些事情变得可以接受之前,就已经发生过。这是一个显著的变化,但也是不可避免的,因为现实总会追上来,无论起初多么令人不适。
但在过去几个月里,先锋矿业赞助商我们都目睹了全球地缘政治的实时转变。

特朗普总统正在升级关税。俄罗斯和中国正在加强对战略资源的控制。一场新的贸易战正在围绕着未来供应链所需的材料形成。

大多数人仍然不明白的是真正的战场不是半导体或人工智能,而是矿产。接下来的几分钟,我将向您展示中国对工业化世界究竟拥有多大的影响力,以及为何确保替代供应突然成为一项国家优先事项。正因如此,我一直密切关注那些不受中国控制的公司,尤其是那些在稳定且对西方友好的司法管辖区运营的公司。今天的赞助商是先锋矿业(Vanguard Mining),该公司在美国市场的股票代码为UU UFF。这家公司之所以引起我的注意,是因为它涉足五种关键金属,而这些金属正是此次市场转变的核心。铜、金、锂、铀,以及一种几乎无人提及的战略金属——马利丁。先锋矿业是我在这个频道介绍过的多元化程度最高的初级资源公司之一。它拥有多种金属、多个项目,并且业务遍及多个司法管辖区。

在当今世界,供应链的重组更多地受到政治而非市场的影响,因此,这种多元化至关重要。以锂为例。价格在2025年中期触底之前暴跌了近90%。但自那以后,价格已经大幅反弹。所谓的锂寒冬已经结束。但真正的问题在于中国控制着全球60%到70%的锂精炼和加工。

这不仅让北京对原材料拥有控制权,而且对整个电池供应链拥有控制权,并能够通过出口限制技术来收紧
控制。

将成为2026年最热门的话题之一。原因显而易见。铜是电气化的基石。中国进口了全球约60%的铜矿石,并消耗了全球近58%的精炼铜。这意味着中国不仅加工铜,而且还决定着铜的价格、库存和未来的
投资方向。马利丁鎓虽然不常出现在新闻头条,但它却至关重要。

它能增强钢铁强度,为国防系统、管道、航空航天和能源基础设施提供动力。中国控制着全球约45%的马利丁鎓产量。但在2025年,中国当局实施了严格的出口管制,导致中国马利丁鎓出口量在一年内下降了超过95%。

这种默默无闻的金属,恰恰是在短缺发生之后才变得至关重要,而不是在短缺发生之前。先锋矿业的投资组合遍布加拿大、巴拉圭和阿根廷。所有这些司法管辖区都对西方国家友好。这就是我喜欢这家公司的原因。

先锋矿业在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省坎卢普斯矿区拥有一个金、铜、钯矿项目。除了控制巴拉圭皮拉尼亚盆地超过9万公顷的土地(该盆地靠近已开发的铀矿资源)之外,先锋集团还重新获得了阿根廷Positos One锂矿太阳能项目100%的权益。随着美国寻求摆脱外国供应链的脆弱性,其任务很明确:不惜一切代价确保国内友好地区的稳定。但真正的关键因素不仅仅是政策,还有大型科技公司。像亚马逊、谷歌和微软这样的公司现在正在绕过传统的公用事业公司,直接从核反应堆获取长期电力。而符合这种条件的能源只有一种:铀。

总之,很少有公司能够满足如此多的需求,并且开采如此多行业所需的关键材料。但请相信我,贵金属和资源将成为2026年的主要话题之一。现在是时候让您对Vanguard Mining进行一番研究了,该公司再次在美国市场交易,股票代码为UU FFF。为了帮助您,我将在下面的视频描述中提供投资者演示文稿、股票代码、网站以及您需要了解的所有信息。一如既往,请在进行任何投资之前自行研究。但在一个矿产正在被用作武器的世界里,战略金属和友好司法管辖区的多元化投资是我密切关注的。感谢大家一直以来的支持,我们将继续发展这个频道,为您提供关于地缘政治的最佳见解,以及影响您财富和生活的市场中的最佳投资机会。一如既往,我

想感谢大家的鼎力支持,我们期待下一个视频中与大家再次相见

Why the UK Chose China (You Won't Believe What USA Did)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIUrrXbBsy4

 Cyrus Janssen  2026年2月2日

The United Kingdom just signed a major new trade deal with China — despite growing pressure from Washington and renewed warnings from Donald Trump. In this video, I break down why the UK made this move, what the deal actually means, and how it signals a much larger shift happening across America’s closest allies. ???? Learn More About Investing in the Future of Mining:

???? Click here for Vanguard Mining Investor Presentation: https://vanguardminingcorp.com/invest...
???? Ticker: CSE: UUU I OTC: UUUFF

Qualified Person: The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by J. T. Shearer, M.Sc., D.I.C., P.Geo. (BC & Ontario), a consulting geologist who is a “Qualified Person” as defined under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43- 101”). Mr. Shearer is not at arm’s length with Vanguard Mining. Qualified Person 2: The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Lawrence Segerstrom, P.Geo., M.SC., MBA, a consulting geologist who is a “

Qualified Person” as such term is defined under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). Mr. Segerstrom is not at arm’s length to Vanguard and is therefore not independent for the purposes of NI 43-101.

00:00 - Why US Allies Are Moving to China
00:50 - How the Global World Order Collapsed
01:51 - Have Trump Tariffs Worked?
02:20 - China's Goal for the World
03:00 - The UK China Trade Deal
05:29 - Is China a Threat to the UK?
07:48 - Why China is the Future
08:33 - How the British Media Changed
10:32 - Vangaurd Mining Sponsor
What if I told you the biggest shift in
global politics right now isn't
happening through wars, but quietly
through America's closest allies moving
away from the United States and pivoting
to China. They say a picture is worth a
thousand words. And this one matters
because in just January 2026 alone, no
fewer than six of America's closest
allies, including France, South Korea,
Ireland, Canada, Finland, and now the
United Kingdom, have sent their national
leaders directly to Beijing to sign
record-breaking new trade deals with
China. And all of this is happening
despite Donald Trump openly threatening
more tariffs, more trade wars, and
economic punishment for any country that
chooses to move closer to Beijing. So,
the obvious question is why is this
happening? Why are America's closest
allies now willing to risk retaliation
from Washington and pivot toward China
anyway? Well, the answer isn't simple.
But to truly understand what this shift
means for the future of global power, we
need to rewind to September 2023 when
then Secretary of State Anthony Blinkin
said something remarkably revealing.
Something that helps explain everything
we're seeing unfold right now. When the
Beijings and Moscows of the world try to
rewrite or rip down the pillars of the
multinateral system. When they falsely
claim that the order exists merely to
advance the interests of the West at the
expense of the rest, a growing global
course of nations and people will say
and stand up to say no. You see, Blinken
was trying to warn us that only
countries like China and Russia would
announce the international rules-based
order is not working. But just 28 months
later, it was surprisingly Canada,
America's closest and most important
trading partner who acknowledged this
forbidden truth at the World Economic
Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The one
line that I simply can't forget from
Mark Carney's speech was, "We are in the
midst of a rupture, not a transition."
And when I explained to you this new
trade deal between the UK and China,
you're going to see how fast things are
changing. It's no secret that tariffs
have been Trump's favorite method to
apply American force and power on
countries around the world. And leading
into Davos, Trump threatened European
allies with additional tariffs if they
blocked America's efforts to gain access
to Greenland. Trump stood on stage and
essentially announced to the world, "We
own the system, and you must do as we
say, but nobody is buying this anymore
in 2026." The signs have been taken out
of the window, as Prime Minister Carney
explained, linking American hegemony to
the fall of the Soviet Union. But now
let's contrast this with the message
from China's government when Hiang,
China's vice premier, opened his speech
by saying, "It gives me great pleasure
to join you in beautiful Davos for the
World Economic Forum annual meeting
under the theme a spirit of dialogue. It
is timely that we listen to each other,
learn from each other, and build
stronger trust with each other." This
message resonated very deeply with the
crowd at Davos. And China's vice premier
would later go on to elaborate that
China wants to build a beneficial and
inclusive economic globalization by
building bridges, not walls, and embrace
multilateralism as the right way to keep
the international order stable. The UK
government heard this message and in a
groundbreaking move has signed the most
significant trade deal we've seen yet
with China. Prime Minister Starmer
announced the success of the deal
proudly on X, stating, "I said my visit
to China would deliver for British
people. I meant it. We've now secured
billions of pounds worth of export and
investment deals for the UK. That's why
I'm here to deliver for you back home."
Now, don't get me wrong, the British
Prime Minister received a lot of flack
both at home and abroad for shifting
closer to China. But when you look at
the numbers and the deals passed during
this meeting, it's going to be a
substantial win for the UK. Cherry, the
Chinese automaker, announced it would
establish its European headquarters in
Liverpool, prompting the local
government to proclaim on X this is one
of the most significant projects for the
city's manufacturing sector in recent
years. Astroenica, one of the world's
largest pharmaceutical companies, struck
an $18.5 billion deal to license a
weight loss drug from China and
committed to a $15 billion investment in
China through 2030 to expand medicine's
manufacturing and R&D. The Chinese
economy is simply too big and too
important to ignore. And in a world
where the United States is wanting to
tariff and produce everything
domestically, those countries who secure
trade deals will win in the long term.
Let's take the UK's whiskey industry for
example. Starmer was able to negotiate a
50% tariff reduction with China, which
is now forecasted to be worth 250
million pounds to the UK economy over
the next 5 years. Finally, the two
countries agreed on visa-free travel for
all British nationals to China, opening
the door for more tourism. There were
even cultural exchanges between the two
countries as the World Snooker Tour,
headquartered in Bristol, managed to
secure a new event in two Chinese cities
worth over 15 million pounds. While
PopMart, makers of the hit toy Lebu,
pledged to open seven stores in the UK,
including a flagship outlet on London's
Oxford Street. Overall, Starmer's 4-day
visit to China secured 2.2 2 billion
pounds in export deals and market access
worth another2.3 billion pounds over the
next 5 years as well as hundreds of
millions of pounds of investment by
Chinese companies. But despite the
crystal clear trade deal wins for both
sides during this negotiation, Trump
immediately slammed the new trade deal
and said it's very dangerous to do
business with China. But I want to share
with you a clip that I feel really
brings a lot of clarity to the
situation. Just listen to how Victor
Gao, a prominent Chinese international
relations expert, answers a hard-hitting
question from the British media.
Are you a competitor? Are you an ally?
Are you a are you a threat? How would
you regard your relationship with
Britain?
First of all, between China and Britain,
from the Chinese perspective, Britain is
not a rival, is not a competitor, it is
not an enemy, is not an adversary.
Britain [music] is just an important
country to get along with in peace and
in friendship and for mutual benefit.
Now, how Britain looks at China, it's up
to the British government and people to
decide. But I think it would be
completely misguided for Britain to view
China as an enemy or adversary or a
competitor. What do China and Britain
compete with? China is the largest
manufacturer of automobiles. Competing
with Britain? No. China is the largest
exporter of EV cars and will lead the
whole world in EV production. Is Britain
a competitor? No. China will be the
biggest and most important producer and
R&D in terms of semiconductor in no
time. Does that mean that China competes
with Britain? No. China will be the
leading nation in AI revolution. Is
Britain a competitor? No. So I think
British government should not
overestimate its impact on the global
scene and view Britain as a rival of
China. China is not. China is a fact.
China is a mega trend for Britain to
live with and get along with. Let's make
peace rather than agitating for war.
Honestly, it's hard to find a better
clip that captures how Chinese policy
makers and much of the Chinese public
are objectively viewing the current
global situation. Notice how the British
interviewer opens with a very western
framing. What is China? Are you a
friend, an adversary, a rival? How
should Britain view you? But Victor Gao,
who first rose to prominence as the
translator for Dang Xiaoping, the
Chinese leader who opened China to the
world in the 1980s, cuts straight
through the noise. His response is
simple and disarming. We are not your
adversary or rival, just an important
country you should be doing business
with. And this is where Victor makes a
point that's rarely said out loud, but
absolutely crucial. A rivalry only
exists if both sides are competing for
leadership in the same industries. So
the real question is this. In which
industries does Britain actually lead
China today? The uncomfortable truth is
none. We've now reached a point where if
you're not collaborating with China in
the future, you're actively choosing to
fall behind. And to really drive this
home, I want to highlight a fascinating
trend that's been circulating on social
media. people comparing photos of
themselves from 2016 and 2026, stunned
by how much has changed in just a
decade. So, let's apply that same lens
to China. Take a look at this data from
2016 based on the light in ranking of
world universities. 10 years ago, only
three Chinese universities cracked the
global top 20. But fast forward to 2026
and China now occupies 16 of the top 20
spots. That's not a slow shift. That's a
structural transformation. and it
happened in a single decade. But to see
how big a shift this is for the UK
government, you need to see just how
dramatic the change has been inside the
British media itself. Just look at this
video published on the BBC's official
YouTube channel just 3 days ago with a
headline that would have been
unthinkable not long ago. China is
owning the future of global power. In
that YouTube video, the BBC's China
correspondent doesn't posture or hedge.
She simply lays out the reality of
China's position in the world today.
This is the factory of the world. It is
the biggest manufacturer in the world.
If you're looking at the future of our
planet, China is the lead in renewables.
It produces everything from around 60 to
80% of electric vehicles, solar panels,
wind turbines, electric batteries. China
makes more robots than anywhere else in
the world. Uh China has and processes
more rare earths than anywhere else in
the world. About 90% of rare earths for
instance. And these are the kind of
extracts, these minerals that are needed
to make anything from an electric
vehicle to your smartphone to Bluetooth
speakers. So when it comes to the future
technology, when it comes to the things
that we've kind of got used to, China
really is key and that is one of the
reasons why so many countries are
flocking here.
Those were not hot takes. They're just
the cold observable facts. But what's
remarkable though is how quickly the
BBC's China narrative has shifted. If we
go back just five years ago, the BBC
published an article titled The
Foreigners in China's Disinformation
Drive, in which it accused a number of
foreign YouTubers, myself included, of
being malignant Chinese propagandists.
But after the past 12 months of
geopolitical realignment, after
governments, corporations, and even
Western media outlets themselves have
adjusted to reality, it turns out none
of us were propagandists at all. We were
simply early. We were reporting what was
already happening long before it became
acceptable to say it out loud. It's a
remarkable change, but it was inevitable
because reality has a way of catching
up, no matter how uncomfortable it is at
first. But over the past few months,
we've all watched global geopolitics
shift in real time. President Trump is
escalating tariffs. Russia and China are
tightening control over strategic
resources. And a new trade war is
forming around the exact materials
needed for tomorrow's supply chains.
What most people still don't understand
is this. The real battlefield isn't
semiconductors or AI. It's minerals. And
in the next few minutes, I'm going to
show you just how much leverage China
already has over the industrialized
world, and why securing alternative
supply has suddenly become a national
priority. That's why I've been paying
close attention to companies positioned
outside China's control, especially
those operating in stable, western
friendly jurisdictions. Today's sponsor
is Vanguard Mining, which trades under
the symbol UU UFF on the US market. This
company caught my attention because
they're exposed to five critical metals
that sit right at the center of this
shift. Copper, gold, lithium, uranium,
and a strategic metal that almost nobody
talks about, Malibdinum. Vanguard Mining
is one of the most diversified junior
resource companies I've ever featured on
this channel. Multiple metals, multiple
projects, and multiple jurisdictions.
That kind of diversification matters in
a world where supply chains are being
reshuffled by politics, not by markets.
Just look at lithium for example. Prices
collapse nearly 90% before bottoming in
mid 2025. But since then, prices have
already rebounded sharply. The so-called
lithium winter is over. But here's the
real issue. China controls 60 to 70% of
global lithium refining and processing.
That gives Beijing leverage not just
over raw materials, but over the entire
battery supply chain and the ability to
tighten the screws via export
restrictions on technology. Copper is
going to be one of the most trending
stories in 2026. And it's easy to see
why. Copper is the backbone of
electrification. China imports roughly
60% of the world's copper ore and
consumes close to 58% of global refined
copper. That means China doesn't just
process copper. It sets the tone for
pricing, inventories, and future
investment. Malibdinum doesn't get
headlines, but it is absolutely
essential. Strengthening steel, enabling
defense systems, pipelines, aerospace,
and energy infrastructure. China
controls roughly 45% of global
malibdinum production. But in 2025,
Chinese authorities introduced strict
export controls and as a result reduced
Chinese malibdinum exports by over 95%
in a single year. This is exactly the
kind of quiet metal that becomes
critical after shortages hit, not
before. Vanguard Mining's portfolio
spans Canada, Paraguay, and Argentina.
All jurisdictions friendly for Western
countries. And here is why I love this
company. Vanguard has a gold, copper,
palladium project in the Camloops mining
district of British Columbia, Canada. In
addition to controlling over 90,000
hectares in Paraguay's Piranha Basin
located near established uranium assets,
Vanguard was also able to reclaim 100%
interest in the Positos one lithium
solar project in Argentina. As the US
looks to decouple from foreign supply
chains vulnerabilities, the mandate is
clear. Secure domestic and friendly
jurisdictions at any cost. But the real
X factor isn't just policy. It's big
tech. Companies like Amazon, Google, and
Microsoft are now bypassing traditional
utilities to secure long-term power
directly from nuclear reactors. And
there is only one source that fits that
profile, uranium. In closing, it's rare
to find a company that ticks so many
boxes and is mining for so many crucial
materials needed in a variety of
industries. But trust me, precious
metals and resources will become one of
the main storylines in 2026. And it's
time for you to do your own research on
Vanguard Mining, which once again trades
under the ticker symbol UU FFF in the US
markets. And to help you out with that,
I'm going to include the investor
presentation, stock symbols, website,
and everything you need to know in the
video description down below. As always,
please do your own research before
making any investments. But in a world
where minerals are becoming weapons,
diversification across strategic metals
and friendly jurisdictions is something
I'm watching very closely. Everyone, I
want to thank you all for your continued
support as we continue to grow this
channel and provide you the best
insights into geopolitics and the best
opportunities in the markets that affect
your money and your life. As always, I
want to thank you all for your
incredible support, and we look forward
to seeing you all in our next video

路过

雷人

握手

鲜花

鸡蛋

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

法律申明|用户条约|隐私声明|手机版|小黑屋|联系我们|www.kwcg.ca

GMT-5, 2026-2-23 21:41 , Processed in 0.027599 second(s), 17 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2021 Comsenz Inc.  

返回顶部