注册 登录
滑铁卢中文论坛 返回首页

风萧萧的个人空间 https://www.kwcg.ca/bbs/?61910 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

日志

Canada 东方依然是红色的——21世纪的中国社会主义

已有 35 次阅读2026-8-11 16:08 |个人分类:中国

东方依然是红色的——21世纪的中国社会主义

卡洛斯·马丁内斯著,丹尼·海峰(撰稿人) 2023年6月

The East is Still Red - Chinese Socialism in the 21st Century

By Carlos Martinez , Danny Haiphong (Contributor)  June 2023


Professor Radhika Desai (University of Manitoba; Convenor, International Manifesto Group):

拉迪卡·德赛教授(曼尼托巴大学;国际宣言小组召集人):

在一个被美国煽动起来的、对中华人民共和国充满愤怒的世界里;在一个西方学术界的大多数学者已经深受其害,在最极端的反华立场和混乱之间摇摆不定的世界里;在一个左翼已经丧失了区分帝国主义和解放的能力的世界里;在一个未能理解现实存在的社会主义所取得的改变世界的成就的世界里;卡洛斯·马丁内斯以其清晰透彻的文笔和敏锐的政治及学术洞察力,照亮了中国在物质、生态、科技和社会领域所取得的成就。如果您想了解这场撼动世界的深刻变革,请阅读此书。

弗朗西斯科·多明格斯博士(拉丁美洲政治专家):

这是一本非常及时且令人欣喜的著作。卡洛斯·马丁内斯在书中对中国社会主义建设的关键特征进行了严谨而富有启发性的分析,这对于理解中国社会主义建设的高度进步性至关重要,尤其对于西方读者而言。马丁内斯的论述深刻透彻,巧妙地拨开了恶意且咄咄逼人的帝国主义反华宣传的迷雾。对于所有希望建设一个更美好、更和平的世界的人来说,这本书都是必读之作。

罗兰·博尔教授(中国人民大学):

在这部重要的新作中,卡洛斯·马丁内斯阐述了西方左翼坚定支持中国社会主义事业的理由。本书基于深入研究,文笔流畅易懂,必将成为任何想要了解中国真相的人不可或缺的参考资料。请认真阅读,汲取其中的真知灼见,并修正您对中国社会主义的看法!

肯·哈蒙德教授(新墨西哥州立大学):

卡洛斯·马丁内斯的《东方依然是红色的:21世纪的中国社会主义》汇集了他近期关于中国革命道路及其为中国人民建设社会主义未来所做努力的诸多文章和评论,涵盖了历史和当代等广泛议题。马丁内斯认识到这一努力所固有的挑战,以及美国主导的帝国主义给中国设置的重重障碍,但他清晰地表明,中国仍然致力于为自身建立一个公正公平的社会经济体系,并将此作为应对全球气候变化这一紧迫任务的一部分。他驳斥了那些将中国视为全球资本主义秩序中新自由主义成员的观点,并坚持认为,必须承认中国在消除绝对贫困、改善人民生活以及引领构建摆脱美国及其盟友霸权统治的新国际秩序方面所取得的成就。这对于左翼关于中国的讨论以及更广泛的政治参与者而言,都是一项非常受欢迎的贡献。

埃利亚斯·贾布尔(里约热内卢州立大学经济学院经济规划理论与政策副教授;《21世纪社会主义经济发展:布尔什维克革命百年之后》合著者):

卡洛斯·马丁内斯在捍卫关于中国社会经济形态本质的前沿观点方面表现卓越。事实上,像他这样论证有力、思想深刻的知识分子实属罕见。本书为读者提供了理解中国及其独特社会主义所需的丰富信息和鲜活理论。卡洛斯·马丁内斯是一位伟大的知识分子和朋友,也是西方马克思主义者中一位值得尊敬的例外。西方马克思主义的发展高度依赖于像马丁内斯这样的人才和创造力。

书评:《东方依然是红色的》(卡洛斯·马丁内斯著)

我们很高兴转载以下来自博客“探索平凡:一位台湾华裔美国养子日常笔记”(Explore the Mundane: Ordinary Notes from a Taiwanese Chinese American Adoptee)对卡洛斯·马丁内斯著作《东方依然是红色的——21世纪的中国社会主义》(The East is Still Red – Chinese Socialism in the 21st Century)的评论。

评论称,这本书“对于马克思列宁主义的初学者以及像我这样在台湾出生并试图理解中国与台湾历史及现状的人来说,都是必读之作”。

评论者凯拉特别强调了书中关于中国革命早期历史、对“毛泽东是怪物”论调的回应、中国共产党对马克思主义的持续坚持以及反对美国主导的对华战争的重要性等章节。

凯拉总结道:

《东方依然是红色的》一书对反击西方的反华、反共宣传做出了重要贡献,并展现了日益增强的

本书探讨了新冷战如何遏制中国。对于组织者和活动家而言,这是一本非凡的指南。我鼓励大家,尤其是左翼人士,认真研读这本杰出的著作,了解社会主义中国。

《东方依然是红色的》可在Praxis出版社网站购买平装本和电子版。

作者兼政治活动家卡洛斯·马丁内斯在其著作《东方依然是红色的》中,以马克思列宁主义的革命科学为基础,有力地论证了社会主义的必要性。

学习历史固然重要,但由于需要消化大量的研究资料,而且文本本身也可能晦涩难懂,因此学习历史可能是一项艰巨的任务。但《东方依然是红色的》却并非如此。马丁内斯的作品通俗易懂,每个章节都相对较短,并细分为清晰的小节。读者很容易理解马丁内斯提出的论点,这些论点都得到了充分的证据和资料的支持。

对我而言,《东方依然是红色的》这本书是必读之作,无论对于我这个马克思列宁主义新手,还是对于一个出生在台湾、试图理解中国与台湾历史及当下关系的人来说,都是如此。马丁内斯的研究和引人入胜的文笔,也为我打开了了解社会主义中国的其他途径和资源。(我在一月份的月度反思文章《走出迷雾》中对此有更详细的阐述,点击此处即可阅读。)

美国统治阶级正试图维护其霸权,我们已经目睹了他们为“遏制”中国而不断升级的行动。这些反华政策是两党共同支持的,正如我们在奥巴马政府2012年的“重返亚洲”战略中所见。无论民主党还是共和党执政,他们都在为美国帝国主义服务,而社会主义——一种对其生存构成直接威胁的意识形态——没有立足之地。

注:以下摘要未能充分展现作者兼政治活动家卡洛斯·马丁内斯(Carlos Martinez)为《东方依然红色》(The East is Still Red)一书所做的深入研究和分析。如同所有书评和感想一样,我已尽力以读者的身份概括其要点(但我强烈建议您亲自阅读此书)。

历史

在讨论1949年中华人民共和国成立时,我们无法回避战争、占领和外交政策对中国历史的诸多影响,包括第二次中日战争、中国内战、第二次世界大战、朝鲜战争、越南战争和冷战。在几乎所有这些战争中,美国都扮演了阴险的角色,无论是其试图促成国民党和中国共产党达成协议的失败尝试,还是其在杜鲁门主义中宣称遏制共产主义,亦或是其(持续的)对台湾的军事支持。

要理解中国长期以来反对外国统治和剥削的斗争,理解中国的经济状况,以及将中国从半封建国家向社会主义国家转型的历史成就置于更广阔的全球关系背景下进行考察,就必须将之置于更广阔的全球关系背景下。

在中国共产党主席毛泽东的领导下,阶级斗争——马克思主义的核心原则之一——对于建设工人阶级及其盟友的繁荣生活至关重要,这一点显而易见。

1949年中华人民共和国成立时,中国是世界上最贫穷的国家之一;当时中国是一个拥有14亿人口的发展中国家,数百万人死于营养不良(即使在非饥荒年份),文盲率居高不下,医疗服务匮乏,尤其是在农村地区。1949年,中国的平均预期寿命仅为38岁。在脱贫攻坚、扫盲运动、土地再分配和工业化之后的几十年里,中国的预期寿命几乎翻了一番,达到68岁,这是社会主义制度下的历史性成就。

对于像我这样刚接触马克思列宁主义和社会主义中国历史的人来说,马丁内斯直接回应批评毛泽东的章节,特别是关于大跃进和文化大革命期间的批评,都很有帮助。不可否认,毛泽东时期犯过错误;然而,研究社会主义中国的历史、吸取教训以及了解毛泽东在组织和动员群众进行革命方面所做出的贡献意义重大。同样重要的是,要记住,虽然毛泽东创建了中华人民共和国并担任中国共产党主席,但他并非所有决策的唯一制定者。即使犯过错误,也必须认识到,在他的领导下,中国得以维护主权并抵御帝国主义的侵略。

最值得注意的是,中国是如何改善全体人民的物质生活条件的,这一点显而易见。马丁内斯反思了中国共产党是如何“领导中国革命——一场旨在提高人民生活水平的革命”的。

废除封建制度,恢复中国国家主权,结束外国对中国的统治,建设社会主义,为中国人民创造更美好的生活,为人类和平繁荣的未来作出贡献。正是由于中国特色社会主义,中国才能将工人阶级及其盟友的利益置于首位,并且至今仍然如此。

现状

随着中国经济增长和实力提升,尤其是在未来几年内,其GDP总量将超过美国,关于中国走上“资本主义道路”的批评之声日益高涨,声称中国正朝着资本主义方向发展,而远离社会主义。马丁内斯迅速回应了这些说法,提供了大量证据,证明中国一直在回应并支持工人阶级的利益。

中国共产党给自己设定了雄心勃勃的目标,即在2021年(中共成立一百周年)消除极端贫困。值得注意的是,消除贫困的努力远远超出了个人收入高于世界银行定义的国际贫困线(1.90美元/天)的范畴。相反,中国政府对“摆脱极端贫困”的定义是“两项保证和三项保障”得到满足。这意味着…… “两项保障是充足的食物和衣物;三项保障是获得医疗服务、有饮用水和电力的安全住房,以及至少九年的免费教育。”扶贫工作不仅限于个人收入,更涵盖其生活质量的方方面面,无论居住在农村还是城市地区。

广大民众的生活条件得到了改善。

然而,与我们这些生活在美国——世界上最发达的国家之一——的人们相比,数百万人仍在为基本权利而奋斗,包括获得优质医疗服务、安全住房和清洁饮用水。在帝国主义统治下,统治阶级总是将利润置于人民的需求和利益之上。

例如,美国的医疗保健系统是一个营利性企业,每年创造数万亿美元的利润。尽管利润如此丰厚,但我们的医疗保健行业却未能提供高质量的医疗服务或必要的医疗保障,这体现在数亿美国人背负着医疗债务(即使他们有医疗保险)。正如人民行动研究所的代表德里克·克罗在接受“现在就民主”采访时所说:“这些公司每年发出2.48亿份医疗拒付通知,要么是事先拒绝授权,要么是……”拒绝提供护理。主流媒体对医疗保健行业的彻底放弃进行了广泛报道,尤其是在联合健康保险公司(UnitedHealthcare)首席执行官布莱恩·汤普森(Brian Thompson)遇害后,弹壳上赫然写着“否认”、“辩护”和“作证”的字样。

在威斯康星州,2024年该州面临多项医疗机构关闭,包括两家医院(均位于西部地区)和19家诊所,这些机构的服务如今要么被整合到其他地区,要么在城市/地区彻底消失。在密尔沃基市,黑人和棕色人种聚居区的重要医疗服务持续关闭,包括南区的一家产科中心。“拯救密尔沃基医疗保健联盟”(Save Milwaukee Healthcare Coalition)是一个由当地组织组成的联盟,致力于捍卫和保护该市公平的医疗保健服务。该联盟报告称,“整个密尔沃基县只有三家医院提供产科服务,而且没有一家位于密尔沃基南区,而该地区的孕产妇死亡率位居全美最高之列。”尽管这些服务对城市和社区至关重要,但由于运营成本高昂、人手短缺,以及(从商业角度来看)最重要的——利润减少,它们可能会关闭。尽管这些医疗服务必不可少,而且确实能挽救生命,但利润却不够丰厚。

在美国,仅医疗保健系统的物质条件就反映了统治阶级——包括保险公司、营利性医疗保健公司、富裕精英和美国政府——是如何以牺牲劳动阶级的利益为代价来牟利的。(附注:我还专门撰写了关于新冠疫情以及美国医疗保健系统和政府部门失灵的文章,您可以在这里阅读。)

如果中国正在成为一个资本主义国家,它就不会继续优先考虑“广大人民群众的近期和长期需求——消除贫困、向绿色能源系统转型、遏制新冠疫情以及提高人民生活水平”。正如马丁内斯所阐明的,这些物质条件之所以成为可能,是因为建立了工人国家,以及中国在社会主义基础上取得的成就。正如他有力地论证的那样,“中国特色社会主义就是社会主义”。

并非任何其他“主义”。

美国帝国主义导致全球各国蓄意发展不足,以维持其世界霸主地位,其手段包括直接军事干预(例如军事基地、占领、政权更迭、不平等条约、非法制裁、资源掠夺和领土扩张)。尽管美国政府及其外交政策声称这一切都是为了民主、自由和独立,但历史揭示了真相。

正如圭亚那历史学家、学者、黑人权力运动和泛非运动的领袖沃尔特·罗德尼在其著作《欧洲如何使非洲欠发达》中所写:“不断扩大的基础设施投资正在推动那些被帝国主义列强强行拖延发展的国家走向进步。”

罗德尼所指的主要是欧洲与非洲的关系,但经济支配和扩张主义都是西方帝国主义的组成部分,它们直接通过掠夺劳动力和资源来创造财富。在分析世界强权及其增长(或停滞)时,理解政治经济学至关重要。正因如此,中国能够迅速实现工业化,并转型为能够为其他国家提供财政和物质支持,使其减少对美国及其剥削性政策和条件的依赖,才显得如此意义重大。

例如,马丁内斯指出中国与全球南方国家之间的合作。了解中国在拉丁美洲和非洲的项目,例如旨在通过投资公路、桥梁、铁路和建筑材料来弥补基础设施缺口的“一带一路”倡议,令人叹为观止。通过发展跨洲基础设施,中国对“一带一路”倡议的投资为这些国家提供了除美国以外的其他投资渠道(最显著的是减少债务和降低利率),并拓宽了贸易路线。

中国渴望建立互利关系并投资发展中国家,这是其构建多极化的战略,也是“被压迫国家的灯塔”。

《东方依然是红色的》一书还详细阐述了中国物质条件如何随着时间的推移而发生变化,从而应对新的矛盾。鉴于中国为消除贫困、提升发展水平而进行的快速工业化,如今中国已将重点转向绿色能源,以此作为改善气候状况的途径。正如中共中央总书记习近平在2013年的讲话中所述:“我们绝不再以牺牲环境为代价追求经济增长。”

显然,中国正在采取行动,积极推进脱碳进程,减少对煤炭的依赖,投资可再生能源(如太阳能、风能、核能和水力发电),并实施全球规模最大的植树造林项目。中国之所以能够坚定不移地拯救地球、保护人类,是因为其实行的是计划经济,而非屈从于统治阶级的意志。

展望未来

中国共产党始终坚持马克思主义,中国政府代表广大人民群众,特别是工人阶级的利益,而非少数富裕精英的利益。中国革命从未结束,它仍在进行中。通往社会主义的道路始终需要根据具体情况进行调整和发展。马丁内斯认为,社会主义者和共产主义者应该捍卫中国社会主义,反对美国主导的针对中国的新冷战。唯一的出路是走向社会主义,并建立统一战线,共同对抗美国帝国主义。

《东方依然是红色的》一书对反击西方反华反共宣传、揭示新冷战为遏制中国而不断升级的现状做出了重要贡献。本书对组织者和活动家而言都是一本非凡的指南,我鼓励大家,尤其是左翼人士,认真研读这本珍贵的著作,了解社会主义中国。

资源:

CODEPINK 主办的“中国不是我们的敌人”系列(YouTube)

卡洛斯·马丁内斯著《东方依然是红色的:21世纪的中国社会主义》(2023年)

新书发布会:《东方依然是红色的》,社会主义中国之友(YouTube视频)

社会主义中国之友,一个支持中华人民共和国并传播对中国社会主义理解的平台

基思·贝内特和卡洛斯·马丁内斯编辑的《人民的中国建国75周年——旗帜依然是红色的》(2024年)

沃尔特·罗德尼著《欧洲如何使非洲欠发达》(1972年)

“黑人神话播客”主持的《神话:中国正在殖民非洲》(第一部分和第二部分)

The East is Still Red - Chinese Socialism in the 21st Century

By Carlos Martinez , Danny Haiphong (Contributor)  June 2023


Professor Radhika Desai (University of Manitoba; Convenor, International Manifesto Group):

In a world gone beserk with US-incited rage against People's China; in a world where the bulk of Western scholarship has become so deeply compromised so as to yo-yo between the most tendentious anti-Chinese positions and confusion; in a world where the left has lost its ability to distinguish between imperialism and liberation; in a world that fails to understand just how world-changing have been the achievements of actually existing socialisms; Carlos Martinez shines the light of his crystal-clear prose and his acute political and scholarly insight on China's achievements, material, ecological, scientific and social. If you want to understand the most profound earthquake shaking up our world, read this book.


Dr Francisco Dominguez (Specialist on Latin American politics):

This is a most welcome and timely book. In it, Carlos Martinez furnishes us with rigorous and illuminating analyses covering crucial features of socialist construction in China, essential, especially for Western audiences, to grasp its highly progressive nature. The penetrating discussion Martinez engages in, elegantly pierces through the thick fog of malicious and aggressive imperialist anti-China propaganda. A must for all those who wish to build a better and peaceful world.


Professor Roland Boer (Renmin University of China):

In this important new book, Carlos Martinez sets out the case for the Western Left's resolute support of the socialist project in China. Based on in-depth research and written in an accessible style, the book will soon become an indispensable resource for anyone who wants to know the facts concerning China. Read it carefully, absorb its insights, and rectify your view of Chinese socialism!

Professor Ken Hammond (New Mexico State University):

Carlos Martinez's The East is Still Red: Chinese Socialism in the 21st Century, brings together essays and commentaries from his recent writings on a wide range of issues, both historical and contemporary, concerning China's revolutionary path and its ongoing efforts to build a socialist future for the Chinese people. Recognizing the challenges inherent in this effort, and the obstacles being placed in China's way by American-led imperialism, Martinez clearly demonstrates that China remains committed to the revolutionary mission of creating a just and equitable social economy for itself and as part of the imperative work of addressing the challenges of global climate change. He rejects those voices which see China as a neoliberal member of the global capitalist order, and upholds the need to recognize China's achievements in eliminating absolute poverty and improving the lives of its people as well as in leading in the construction of a new international order outside the hegemonic domination of the United States and its allies. This is a most welcome contribution to the discourse about China on the Left, and for a broader audience of the politically engaged.


Elias Jabbour (Associate professor of theory and policy of economic planning at Rio de Janeiro State University's School of Economics; Co-author of 'Socialist Economic Development in the 21st Century: A Century after the Bolshevik Revolution'):

Carlos Martinez has excelled in defending frontier positions on the nature of the Chinese socioeconomic formation. In fact, it is very rare to find intellectuals with his argumentative power and intellectual sophistication. In this book, the reader will have access to a wide source of information and living theory necessary to understand China and its unique socialism. Carlos Martinez, great intellectual and friend, is an honourable exception among Marxists in the West. Marxism in the West depends heavily on the talent and creativity of people like Martinez.

Book Review: The East is Still Red by Carlos Martinez

We are pleased to reproduce below a review of Carlos Martinez’s The East is Still Red – Chinese Socialism in the 21st Century, from the blog Explore the Mundane: Ordinary Notes from a Taiwanese Chinese American Adoptee.

The book is described as being a necessary read, “both as a person newer to Marxism-Leninism and as a person born in Taiwan trying to understand the historical and present relationship between China and Taiwan.”

The reviewer, Kayla, highlights in particular the sections covering the early history of the Chinese Revolution; the response to the “Mao as monster” narrative; The Communist Party of China’s continuing commitment to Marxism; and the importance of opposing the US-led drive to war with China.

Kayla concludes:

The East is Still Red is a significant contribution to combat the West’s anti-China, anti-communist propaganda and to demonstrate the increasing escalation of the new Cold War to contain China. This book is an extraordinary guide for organizers and activists alike, and I would encourage folks especially on the left, to study this extraordinary resource and to learn about socialist China.

The East is Still Red can be purchased in paperback and digital format from the Praxis Press website.


Author and political activist Carlos Martinez writes a compelling case about the necessity of socialism, rooted in the revolutionary science of Marxist-Leninism, in his book The East is Still Red.

Learning about history, though essential, can be a daunting task because of how much research is digested and how dense the text itself can be. This is not the case with The East is Still Red. Martinez’s work is incredibly accessible and digestible, with each chapter being relatively short and broken into clear subsections. It’s easy to follow along with the arguments that Martinez presents, backed with ample evidence and sources.

The East is Still Red was necessary for me to read, both as a person newer to Marxism-Leninism and as a person born in Taiwan trying to understand the historical and present relationship between China and Taiwan. Through Martinez’ research and compelling writing, it’s also opened other avenues and resources to learn about socialist China. (I wrote more about this in January’s monthly reflection, “On Coming Out of the Fog” which you can read HERE.)

The U.S. ruling class is trying to maintain its hegemony, and we’ve seen the ongoing and increasing escalations to ‘contain’ China. These anti-China policies are bipartisan, as we saw with the Obama administration’s 2012 ‘Pivot to Asia’. Regardless of whether the Democratic party or the Republican party are in office, they both serve U.S. imperialism where there is no place for socialism, a direct threat to their existence. 

Note: The summary below does not do justice to the thorough research and analysis that author and political activist Carlos Martinez conducted for The East is Still Red. As with all book reviews and reflections, I’ve done my best to highlight key takeaways as a reader (though I cannot emphasize enough to check out this book for yourself). 

PAST

It’s impossible to discuss the founding of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 without mentioning the multifarious ways that war, occupation, and foreign policy have contributed to China’s history, including the Second Sino-Japanese War, the Chinese Civil War, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Cold War. And, in nearly all of these wars, the U.S. played an insidious role whether it was its failed attempts to negotiate an agreement between the Kuomintang (KMT) and the Communist Party of China (CPC), its declaration to contain communism in the Truman Doctrine, or its (ongoing) military support for Taiwan.

This broader context of global relations is necessary to understand the long fight against foreign domination and exploitation, to understand the economic conditions of China, and to contextualize its historic achievements of evolving from a semi-feudal country towards a socialist country. 

Under the leadership of Mao Zedong, Chairman of the governing Communist Party of China (CPC), it’s abundantly clear that class struggle – a core tenet of Marxism – was (and remains) central to building a prosperous life for the working class and its allies. 

When the PRC was founded in 1949, China was one of the poorest countries in the world; it was a developing country of 1.4 billion people with millions dying from malnutrition (in non-famine years), illiteracy rates for the majority of the population, and absent medical services, particularly for those living in the countrysides. In 1949, the life expectancy in China was 38 years. In the decades following the poverty alleviation efforts, mass literacy campaigns, land redistribution, and industrialisation, the life expectancy in China almost doubled to 68 years, a historic contribution under socialism. 

As a person newer to Marxism-Leninism and to studying the history of socialist China, the sections where Martinez directly confronts the criticisms of Mao, particularly during the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, were useful. It’s undeniable that mistakes were made under Mao; however, studying the history of socialist China, its lessons, and Mao’s contributions to organizing and mobilizing masses of people for revolution are significant. It’s also important to remember that while Mao founded the PRC and served as chairman of the CPC, he wasn’t the sole person making all of the decisions. Even with the errors that were made, it’s crucial to recognize that, under his leadership, China was able to maintain its sovereignty and defend itself from imperialist attacks. 

Most notably, It’s clear how China was able to improve the material living conditions for all of its people. Martinez reflects how the CPC “has led the Chinese Revolution – a revolution to eliminate feudalism, to regain China’s national sovereignty, to end foreign domination of China, to build socialism, to create a better life for the Chinese people, and to contribute to a peaceful and prosperous future for humanity.” It is because of socialism (with Chinese characteristics) that China was able to prioritize the interests of the working class and its allies and continues to do so today.

PRESENT

As China’s economic growth and power rises, notably passing the U.S. in absolute GDP terms within the next few years, the criticism of China leading down ‘the capitalist road’ has gained traction, purporting that the country is moving closer towards capitalism and further away from socialism. Martinez swiftly responds to these claims by providing ample evidence of China responding to, and continuing to support, the interests of the working class. 

The CPC tasked itself with the robust goal to eliminate extreme poverty by 2021 (a century after the founding of the CPC). It’s crucial to note that the poverty elimination efforts extended far beyond an individual’s income being above the World Bank-defined international poverty line of $1.90 USD/day. Instead, the Chinese government’s definition of leaving extreme poverty meant that “two assurances and three guarantees” have been met. That meant “the two assurances are for adequate food and clothing; the three guarantees are for access to medical services, safe housing with drinking water and electricity, and at least nine years of free education.” The poverty alleviation efforts extend beyond an individual’s income and encompasses their entire quality of life, regardless of whether you’re living in the countryside or in more urban areas. 

The living conditions improved for the broad masses of the people. 

Compared to those of us living in the U.S., one  of the most developed countries in the world, millions of people are still fighting for basic rights, including quality access to medical services, safe housing, and clean drinking water. Under imperialism, the ruling class will always prioritize profit over the needs and interests of the people. 

For example, the U.S. healthcare system is a for-profit business, generating trillions of dollars each year. Despite this immense profit, our healthcare industry does not provide quality access to healthcare or coverage to needed care, reflected in the hundred million Americans who have medical debt (even with health insurance). As Derrick Crowe, a representative for People’s Action Institute, reports in a Democracy Now interview, “248 million care denials are issued by these companies every year, either through a prior authorization denial or a care denial.” The thorough abandonment of the healthcare industry was largely publicized by mainstream media outlets most notably after the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, where the words “deny,” “defend,” and “depose” were written on the shell casings. 

On a local level, in 2024, the state of Wisconsin faced several closures, including 2 hospitals (both in the western region) and 19 clinics where services are now consolidated and centralized or nonexistent in the city/area. In the city of Milwaukee, vital healthcare services continue to close in Black and brown areas of the city, including a labor and delivery unit on the South Side. The Save Milwaukee Healthcare Coalition, a coalition of local organizations fighting to defend and protect access to equitable healthcare in the city, reports that “only 3 hospitals in the entire county of Milwaukee offer labor and delivery services, and none are located on the South Side of Milwaukee, where some of the highest maternal mortality rates are reported.” Even though these services are essential for the city and for the community, they may close due to high operational costs, a shortage of workers, and most importantly (from the business perspective), less profit. Even though these medical services are necessary and literally life saving, the profit is not substantial enough. 

In the U.S., our material conditions in the healthcare system alone reflect how the ruling class – including insurance corporations, for-profit healthcare companies, the wealthy elite, and the U.S. government – all profit at the expense of the working class. (Side note: I’ve also written specifically about COVID-19 and the failure of the U.S. healthcare system and government administrations which you can read HERE.)

If China was becoming a capitalist country, it would not continue to prioritize the “immediate and long term needs of the masses of the people – eradicating poverty, transitioning to green energy systems, suppressing COVID-19, [and] improving people’s living standards.” As Martinez makes clear, these material conditions are possible because of the creation of a worker’s state and China’s achievements all built upon socialist foundations. As he firmly illustrates, “socialism with Chinese Characteristics is socialism.” It is not any other “ism.”

U.S. imperialism leads to the purposeful underdevelopment of global countries to maintain its status as the leading world empire, whether through direct military involvement (i.e. military bases, occupation, regime changes, unequal treaties, illegal sanctions, resource extraction, and territorial acquisitions). While the U.S. government and its foreign policies all claim these to be in the name of democracy, freedom, and independence, history reveals the truth.

As Guyanese historian, academic, and leader of the Black Power and Pan-African movements across the diaspora, Walter Rodney, composed in How Europe Underdeveloped Africa: “The expanding infrastructure investment is enabling development of countries that have been forcibly underdeveloped by the imperialist powers.” 

While Rodney is speaking specifically to the relationship between Europe and Africa, the aspects of economic domination and expansionism are both part of Western imperialism which generate wealth directly from the extraction of labor and resources. Understanding the political economy is necessary when analyzing world powers and growth (or lack thereof). And, it’s why it’s so significant that China was able to rapidly industrialize its country and shift to being able to financially and materially support other countries to be less dependent on the U.S. and its exploitative policies and conditions. 

For example, Martinez points to the global cooperation between China and the Global South. It’s extraordinary to learn about the projects in Latin America and Africa, like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) which aims to address the infrastructure gap by investing in roads/highways, bridges, railways, and construction materials. By developing transcontinental infrastructures, China’s investment of the BPI provides countries with other investment outlets rather than only the U.S. (most notably less debt and lower interest rates) and expanded trade routes. 

China’s desire to build mutually beneficial relationships and invest in developing countries is a strategy to establish multi-polarity and is “a beacon to oppressed nations.” 

The East is Still Red also details how the material conditions in China changed over time, thus responding to a new contradiction. Given China’s rapid industrialization to alleviate poverty and bring it up to speed, China has now shifted to focus on green energy as a way to recover their climate conditions. As CPC General Secretary Xi Jinping stated in his speech in 2013, “We will never again seek economic growth at the cost of the environment.”

It’s clear that China is taking action, aggressively pursuing decarbonization efforts, reducing their reliance on coal, investing in renewable energy sources (such as solar, wind, nuclear, and hydropower), and carrying out the largest forestation project in the world. Saving the planet and protecting humanity is being fiercely carried out by China because of their planned economy, not bowing to the whims of the priorities of the ruling class. 

MOVING FORWARD

The CPC has maintained its commitment to Marxism, where the Chinese government represents the interests of the masses of the people, particularly the working class, rather than a small group of wealthy elites. The Chinese Revolution never ended; it’s still in progress. The pathway to socialism will always require adaptation and growth based on concrete conditions. 

Martinez argues that socialists and communists should defend Chinese socialism and oppose the US-led New Cold War on China. The only way forward is towards socialism and building a united front to stand against U.S. imperialism.  

The East is Still Red is a significant contribution to combat the West’s anti-China, anti-communist propaganda and to demonstrate the increasing escalation of the new Cold War to contain China. This book is an extraordinary guide for organizers and activists alike, and I would encourage folks especially on the left, to study this extraordinary resource and to learn about socialist China.

RESOURCES:


路过

鸡蛋

鲜花

握手

雷人

评论 (0 个评论)

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

法律申明|用户条约|隐私声明|手机版|小黑屋|联系我们|www.kwcg.ca

GMT-5, 2026-8-16 09:12 , Processed in 0.018275 second(s), 17 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2021 Comsenz Inc.  

返回顶部