||
Oh My God the Filmmaker Peter Rodger tries to dig the Nature of the Religions
This is a group of reproduced Videos links and articles regarding the film <Oh My God> of Peter Rodger - A Rational Man digs the Nature of the Religions.
May 26, 2014, I wrote an article <The director of "The Hunger Games" tought his son to have played "The Killer Games">, from then I often think of the father of Elliot Rodger, the filmmaker Peter Rodger with searching more information about him.
Now, I have a strong sense that Mr. Peter Rodger is the most rational filmmaker.
He said in 2009:
" My goal was to find out what ‘God’ means to people, and to determine whether religion and religious people were causing all the world’s problems,” “There was such commonality in all the responses that at one point I didn’t even think I had a film."
" … And then it occurred to me that if there are all these placid descriptions, why is there so much turmoil, upheaval and war in the name of God? I realized that the problem in the world may be what Man does with ‘God’ — how he uses it to control other men, how he twists the preaching of its prophets to create politicized clubs that serve his narrow ends." - <Elliot Rodger ‘Hunger Games’ Connection Shocking?>.
German philosopher and anthropologist Ludwig Feuerbach (1804 – 1872) was a best known for his bookThe Essence of Christianity that strongly influenced generations of later thinkers, including both Karl Marxand Frederich Engels. Many of his philosophical writings offered a critical analysis of religion. His thought was influential in the development of dialectical materialism, where he is often recognized as a bridge between Hegel and Marx.
In <The Essence of Religion> 1841, Ludwig Feuerbach said with that:
"The religious admiration of divine wisdom in Nature is only an incident of enthusiasm; it refers only to the means, but is extinguished in reflecting on the purposes of Nature. How wonderful is the spider’s web, how wonderful the funnel of the ant-lion in the sand! But what is the purpose of these wise arrangements? Nothing but nourishment -- a purpose which man in regard to himself degrades to a mere means. 'Others,' said Socrates -- but these others are animals and brutish men -- 'others live in order to eat, but I eat in order to live.'”
Bill Maher, an American stand-up comedian, television host, political commentator, satirist, author, and actor. is highly critical of religion and views it as highly destructive. His Religulous Full Documentary (2008) reveals Religious deceptive.
Bill Maher - Religulous Full Documentary (2008)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2zhlDbMfDg
Collection of Bill Maher stand-up about religion
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POhryDr0Q4g
It is worth noting that, only the people like Ludwig Feuerbach, Bill Maher and those who have paid depth observation and thinking for the society can rationally make the right judgment.
According to Crowd psychology, as an individual, once she or he joins the group, will lose self-assertive, blindly follow others, easily to be controlled by a few mindless people. Therefore, most people accepted view, in fact, still is the view of the fewer people.
In the book <L'age des foules> (The Era of Mob), Monsieur Serge Moscovici said that: In short, the era of mob is a handful of people on the illegal use of a huge crowd in order to achieve the purpose of the interests of small groups face sounding era.
Therefore, in many cases, that most people accepted opinion is not reliable. The religious fanaticism of the most people is a such case.
As same as absurd religions, the holy Democracy is also to be used as reasonable name for making brutal massacre by the politicians who are without a human mind.
March 7, 2014, in the article <By the Name of Democracy to Free Brain-defective>, I said that:
"Kind people must have deeply worried for the current social uprest in Iraq, the endless bomb-blasts result the terrible casualties of the innocent Iraqi people and have led them live in the life of terror."
"Is it the Iraqi people too ignorance to enjoy the Democracy that Americans forced gift to them? Or, the American politicians intendedly did some thing else under the guise of democracy?Or, for being the U.S. President or being the U.S. policy-makers, it on
"In Canada, I met some Iraqi refugees, there many times ask them with the same question that: how to view the former president Saddam Hussein? Their answers are similar: Before we hated him, he was too brutal. However, now we miss him and hope that he is still our president, because on
"Democracy is good, but not a political panacea that is suitable for all of the races or the countries, or to the particular historical stage of those races or countries, especially for the regions of the forces of Religions or Tribes are too strong."
"Please think that, today, who? is it the Democracy? Or, is it great United States of America? ......? Can give the peace to the people of Iraq, Libya, and Egypt, and those will be coming soon, because of that the troops of the United States are free now after finished great balancing jobs in the Iraq and Afghanistan."
"The U.S. military now is being sent to the Asia-Pacific to make the same balance for the countries in there, so that the people of those countries can enjoy a life as that of Iraqis and Afghans are enjoying in their hometowns that U.S. has full-heartedly balanced with the exchanges by the blood and lives of their Young American soldiers who are from the innocent American families."
"There are reports that even though these soldiers survived in the balancing tasks on the battlefield in Iraq or Afghanistan and lukily returned to the home in U.S., but, they would lifelong unlukily live in the fear of terror battlefield psychological injuries, and many of them have committed suicide to end this fear."
"Historically, by the Guises of their Faith, some people launched Crusades to carry out Massacre."
"Today, by the Guises of Democracy, some people also intendedly carry out Massacre by launching political unrest in their interested regions or countries, no matter their purpose is how nice, but the actual result is as so. What have happened in the Iraq, and Afghanistan are the best proof."
"Please compare the behaviors of bomb attacker with that of dictator Saddam Hussein, who is more cruel? One is killing innocents, one is killing for maintaining a safe society."
Dec. 02, 2014, <659 people killed in Iraq's violence in November>
Jan. 19, 2014, <22 killed, 65 wounded in bombing attacks in Iraq's capital>.
Feb. 27, 2014, <47 killed, over 70 injured in Iraq violence>.
Mar. 09, 2014, <Suicide bomber kills 34 at crowded Iraq checkpoint>
<The chaos in Iraq proves that history doesn't follow America's optimistic script>
Today, June 20, 2014 , I would like to say that, obviously, the former dictator Saddam Hussein was a significant peacekeeper in the worsest area that is difficult to keep peace on the world.
Now, I would like to repeat what I have said in May 26, 2014 article <The director of "The Hunger Games" tought his son to have played "The Killer Games">:
"Here, I would like to apologize earnestly to Mr.Peter Rodger for the wrong in the title, and to show my sympathy for the loss of his son. However, I would like to keep the title without change, I hope to give others a warning."
It is high time to end the partisan politics.
It Is Time to Kick Out Brain-Defective Politicians by MRI scan.
US Self-disabled by Ruining Credibility.
Oh My God with Producer, Peter Rodger - YouTube
By Andrew Schenker ON November 8, 2009 Go to Comments (0)
Give Peter Rodger credit for audacity: In Oh My God, the writer, director, producer, and DP jets around the world, traveling from Africa to India, Japan to Israel, to ask an assortment of religious leaders and extremists, everyday people, and celebrity ringers that vague, if endlessly provocative question, "What is God?" Or rather don't, since what seems like an audacious endeavor—as well as a genuine inquiry borne of personal uncertainty—dissolves into empty exercise when we realize that Rodger is simply shaping his material to accord with a predetermined viewpoint. Not that, throughout his travels, the filmmaker doesn't uncover a multiplicity of perspectives, nor even illuminate some of the reasons behind mankind's essential need to believe, it's just that those opinions that don't agree with the final assessment of several of Rodger's subjects (including Ringo Starr) that "God is love" are given short shrift.
Appearing on screen, Rodger claims he made his film because he couldn't understand how an institution that fundamentally preaches tolerance can become such a force for hatred and violence. But rather than show a similar tolerance for his own subjects, he arranges their testimony in such a way to promote the idea that God is an essentially positive presence (or at least concept) that teaches us to do good and that religious conflict has nothing to do with the man upstairs; it's based on either a desire for land and power or a misreading of scripture. Not such a bad conclusion but hardly the only one a thinking person is likely to reach. And, in Oh My God, those who disagree with the party line are summarily contradicted.
When Rodger visits Israel's occupied territories, his sunny optimism about the future of Jewish-Arab relations (illustrated by footage of leaders of both parties walking literally hand-in-hand) is temporarily disturbed by an American rabbi expressing doubts about a Palestinian state according Jews the same rights Israel grants people of other religions. But only temporarily, since the director immediately cuts in footage of another rabbi happily living in an Arab state to refute him. Similarly, when Rodger visits with a jihadist in an "undisclosed location," he challenges his subject to locate the passage in the Koran that explains how non-Muslims will burn in hell. As the man searches the text, Rodger edits the footage into a flippant montage scored to bubbly pop music—the better to ridicule the man. Then when the Muslim does locate the passage, the filmmaker cuts to an American Islamic leader to explain (rather unconvincingly, it seems) how the jihadist has misinterpreted the text. No doubt the militant's attitude is regrettably—and dangerously—blinkered, but so is Rodger's. Why even bother letting the man speak in the first place when you just plan on haughtily contradicting him in a display of your own superiority?
Actually the most audacious thing about the film may be its appallingly bad taste. Rodger employs questionable rhetorical strategies so frequently that it doesn't make sense to label them lapses of judgment; after a while, they seem like his regular working method. After all, this is a man who thinks nothing of posing fatuous questions about God to Katrina survivors and children suffering from cancer in order to prove the existence of faith in the most unlikely situations, a man who lovingly turns his camera on Seal as the singer sentimentally equates the existence of a higher power with the pictures of his family he keeps in a locket, and a director who dresses his film in an assaultive aesthetic that makes sure we're not granted much leisure to contemplate his subjects' words. Never content to simply let an interviewee speak, Rodger continually cuts away from his subject, assembling video and audio montages (the latter of which often turn parts of a talking head's speech into something like a dance remix) to undercut the contemplative pretense of his project.
But it's not like most of the people Rodger talks to are dispensing remarkable insights anyway; the religious leaders have a slight leg up on the celebrities, but they're hardly much more enlightening. Still, at least one subject—musician Bob Geldof—refuses to play along. After asserting his absolute atheism, he questions his very inclusion in the project. "You asked me to do the film," he tells Rodger. "I have a very pedestrian point of view." At least he admits it..
Oh My God? Directed by Peter Rodger
On
The quest begins in the United States with an interview with a born-again Christian owner of a gun shop. A human beha
During trips to India, Australia, and Bali, the filmmaker talks to people who are concerned about God and religious warfare, the question of why human beings must suffer, the aboriginal path of singing to God, and the creative dimension of Hinduism on the "island of the Gods." In Tibet, Rodger is confronted by Buddhist spirituality and in Eastern Africa, he encounters the Maasai tribal people and their rituals of animal sacrifices. The filmmaker sums up four ways people seem to think of God: as Creator, as policeman, as giver of eternal life, and as the scapegoat when things go wrong.
Perhaps the most moving segment in the documentary is the visit with a hospitable Jewish rabbi and a Palestinian community leader and peace advocate who embrace and concur with the notion that God is the space between us when we meet with true presence and love. The two most troubling vignettes are on
This documentary is a spiritual adventure where you can have a close encounter with faith, devotion, suffering, the natural world, community, inner peace, sacrifice, and service of others. Celebrities appear throughout the film including Hugh Jackman, Ringo Starr, David Copperfield, Jack Thompson, and others. The on
法律申明|用户条约|隐私声明|小黑屋|手机版|联系我们|www.kwcg.ca
GMT-5, 2024-5-17 18:17 , Processed in 0.021053 second(s), 17 queries , Gzip On.
Powered by Discuz! X3.4
© 2001-2021 Comsenz Inc.