http://buchanan.org/blog/how-the-chinese-must-see-us-4595
How the Chinese Must See Us
22 Jan
By Patrick J. Buchanan
“O would some power the gift to give us to see ourselves as others see us,” wrote the poet Robert Burns.
As Hu Jintao wings his way home, America’s hectoring still ringing in his ears, he must be thinking that maybe we Americans should stop lecturing them and take a closer look at ourselves.
Revalue your currency, we demand of the Chinese, stop running these trade surpluses at our expense, start practicing free trade, and abandon these mercantilist and protectionist policies.
But why should they? Why should China abandon a trade policy that is working marvelously well for them, and adopt a trade policy that is failing dismally for us? Does that make sense?
Why should any nation emulate the U.S. trade policy of the Bush-Clinton-Bush era that has stripped us of a third of our manufacturing jobs and made us dependent on China and the world for the needs of our national life and the borrowed money to pay for them?
Why would China, seeking to make herself an independent and self-sufficient nation, adopt a policy that cost us our independence?
And what are the Chinese doing in their ascendancy to first power on earth that we did not do in ours?
Are our Milton Friedmanite free-traders unaware of how it was that, in the last third of the 19th century, we left the British in the dust? Are they unaware we had the highest tariffs on earth to price British products out of our market and goad rapacious Yankees into building new factories to produce the same goods we were then importing from Great Britain?
Lest we forget, the Americans who turned this country into the industrial marvel of mankind were known as “Robber Barons.”
As they put America first in our rise, the Chinese are putting China first.
Our grand strategists demand to know why the Chinese are making these brash claims to all the islands in the South China and East China seas. Why are they telling us to keep our aircraft carriers out of the Yellow Sea and out of the Taiwan Strait? Who do they think they are?
Well, maybe they think they’re 19th-century Americans.
Did not James Monroe and John Quincy Adams brashly tell the great powers of Europe to stay out of our hemisphere?
What are the Chinese about, other than imposing a Monroe Doctrine of their own? As historian Walter McDougall writes, Otto von Bismarck was as affronted by us as we are by the Chinese, declaring that the Monroe Doctrine represented “a species of arrogance peculiarly American and inexcusable.”
Hu Jintao got an earful from us on his human rights records. Stop the repression of Uighurs and Tibetans. Stop jailing political dissidents. Allow more freedom of the Internet and the press.
But on his way home, Hu must be thinking to himself: Who are these Americans to lecture us?
Is this not the same tribe that enslaved black people for 250 years and segregated them for a century? Is this not the same tribe that drove the Indians off their lands, then stuck them all in Bantustans called reservations? Are these not the only people in history to have dropped atomic bombs on defenseless cities?
How would we have reacted if Hu, instead of pretending he couldn’t hear the translation of that question about human rights, retorted, “We Chinese are also concerned about what we read of human rights at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, of renditions, torture and something called ‘water-boarding.’”
This is not written in defense of the Chinese communists who are a purposeful and ruthless lot, but to suggest that we Americans no longer look like the self-confident nation of Dwight Eisenhower and JFK that was unintimidated by the brutal and bullying Soviet Union of Nikita Khrushchev.
We were in a great struggle then — and acted like we could win it.
But as America sinks economically and retreats strategically, while China grows at 10 percent and bristles with confidence, we appear to be a nation of whiners. They are eating our lunch, and we sound like losers in a locker room.
We demand that the Chinese be more open and tolerant of opposition and dissent. But when they look at the gridlock of American democracy, the pettiness of our politics and the failure of our policies, while they are on the move at home and all over the world, why should they want to be more like us?
Has our American capitalism in this century performed as well as their autocratic capitalism? Is our political performance an argument for the superiority of our ballyhooed democracy over their one-party state?
We can’t win or end our wars, balance our budgets or control our borders. Great states like California and Illinois appear about to go belly-up. The U.S. government is running a third straight deficit of near 10 percent of our entire economy. We used our stimulus money to save government jobs. They used theirs for bullet trains.
Time to see ourselves as others see us.








胡锦涛满耳朵都是我们的人权说教:停止压迫西藏人和维吾尔人,停止
关押不同政见人士,允许互联网和新闻自由。
但是他在回家的路上一定在想:他们凭什么来教训我们?
难道不是这些人,曾经奴役黑人长达250年,然后又把黑人隔离了一个
世纪?难道不是这些人把印第安人赶出了他们的土地,把他们圈养在
一块块称为保留地的所谓“家园”里?难道不是这些人,当年在不设防的
城市上扔了原子弹?
如果我们听到胡锦涛对我们说“我们中国人也非常关注在Abu Ghraib和
关塔纳摩监狱的人权状况,还有境外审讯,折磨,和一种称之为”水刑“
的东西”,我们如果没有装作听不懂这个人权方面的提问而转移话题,会
做出什么样的反应?
这篇文章不是为了给中共开脱,那是一群有目的性而且又无情的人,这篇
文章要说的是我们美国人不再像是一个在艾森豪威尔和约翰肯尼迪时代的
那个自信的,在暴虐和欺强凌弱的赫鲁晓夫的苏联面前毫无畏惧的民族。
在那个时候我们进行了艰苦的斗争,做起事来就像我们能够胜利。
但是随着美国的经济衰落和战略撤退,同时中国的经济以10%的速率增长
并充满了信息,我们似乎成了一个爱抱怨的民族。他们在吃我们的午餐,
而我们就像是在更衣室里的失败者。
我们要求中国人对反对派和不同政见着更加开放和宽容,但是当他们看到
美国的民主制度中的无所事事,政治上的琐碎和卑鄙,以及我们的政策的
失败,而与此同时他们在本国和全世界范围内不断地向前走,他们有什
么理由想变得更象我们?
在本世纪,我们美国的资本主义的表现有没有他们的专制资本主义一样好?
我们在政治上的表现能够做为证明我们的宝莱坞式的民主制度在他们的一
党专制的制度面前的优越性d的证据吗?
我们无法赢得并结束我们的战争,无法平衡我们的预算或者控制我们的边
境,伟大的加利福尼亚和伊利诺斯州看着象马上就要破产,美国政府连续
三年创造了相当于我们的经济总规模的将近10%的赤字,我们用我们的刺激
经济自己来挽救政府部门的工作,他们用他们的钱造了子弹列车。
现在是时候来像别人看我们一样看看自己了。