滑铁卢华人, 水城百事论坛
+ 发帖 登录 注册
0

布坎南文章:How the Chinese Must See Us.美国的右派至少还有几个敢直话直说的,不象加州那些同性恋那么唧唧歪歪 〖热点〗

wolf 管理员 · 2011-03-06 11:32 · 2719 阅读 · #62355
http://buchanan.org/blog/how-the-chinese-must-see-us-4595

How the Chinese Must See Us
22 Jan

By Patrick J. Buchanan

“O would some power the gift to give us to see ourselves as others see us,” wrote the poet Robert Burns.

As Hu Jintao wings his way home, America’s hectoring still ringing in his ears, he must be thinking that maybe we Americans should stop lecturing them and take a closer look at ourselves.

Revalue your currency, we demand of the Chinese, stop running these trade surpluses at our expense, start practicing free trade, and abandon these mercantilist and protectionist policies.

But why should they? Why should China abandon a trade policy that is working marvelously well for them, and adopt a trade policy that is failing dismally for us? Does that make sense?

Why should any nation emulate the U.S. trade policy of the Bush-Clinton-Bush era that has stripped us of a third of our manufacturing jobs and made us dependent on China and the world for the needs of our national life and the borrowed money to pay for them?

Why would China, seeking to make herself an independent and self-sufficient nation, adopt a policy that cost us our independence?

And what are the Chinese doing in their ascendancy to first power on earth that we did not do in ours?

Are our Milton Friedmanite free-traders unaware of how it was that, in the last third of the 19th century, we left the British in the dust? Are they unaware we had the highest tariffs on earth to price British products out of our market and goad rapacious Yankees into building new factories to produce the same goods we were then importing from Great Britain?

Lest we forget, the Americans who turned this country into the industrial marvel of mankind were known as “Robber Barons.”

As they put America first in our rise, the Chinese are putting China first.

Our grand strategists demand to know why the Chinese are making these brash claims to all the islands in the South China and East China seas. Why are they telling us to keep our aircraft carriers out of the Yellow Sea and out of the Taiwan Strait? Who do they think they are?

Well, maybe they think they’re 19th-century Americans.

Did not James Monroe and John Quincy Adams brashly tell the great powers of Europe to stay out of our hemisphere?

What are the Chinese about, other than imposing a Monroe Doctrine of their own? As historian Walter McDougall writes, Otto von Bismarck was as affronted by us as we are by the Chinese, declaring that the Monroe Doctrine represented “a species of arrogance peculiarly American and inexcusable.”

Hu Jintao got an earful from us on his human rights records. Stop the repression of Uighurs and Tibetans. Stop jailing political dissidents. Allow more freedom of the Internet and the press.

But on his way home, Hu must be thinking to himself: Who are these Americans to lecture us?

Is this not the same tribe that enslaved black people for 250 years and segregated them for a century? Is this not the same tribe that drove the Indians off their lands, then stuck them all in Bantustans called reservations? Are these not the only people in history to have dropped atomic bombs on defenseless cities?

How would we have reacted if Hu, instead of pretending he couldn’t hear the translation of that question about human rights, retorted, “We Chinese are also concerned about what we read of human rights at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, of renditions, torture and something called ‘water-boarding.’”

This is not written in defense of the Chinese communists who are a purposeful and ruthless lot, but to suggest that we Americans no longer look like the self-confident nation of Dwight Eisenhower and JFK that was unintimidated by the brutal and bullying Soviet Union of Nikita Khrushchev.

We were in a great struggle then — and acted like we could win it.

But as America sinks economically and retreats strategically, while China grows at 10 percent and bristles with confidence, we appear to be a nation of whiners. They are eating our lunch, and we sound like losers in a locker room.

We demand that the Chinese be more open and tolerant of opposition and dissent. But when they look at the gridlock of American democracy, the pettiness of our politics and the failure of our policies, while they are on the move at home and all over the world, why should they want to be more like us?

Has our American capitalism in this century performed as well as their autocratic capitalism? Is our political performance an argument for the superiority of our ballyhooed democracy over their one-party state?

We can’t win or end our wars, balance our budgets or control our borders. Great states like California and Illinois appear about to go belly-up. The U.S. government is running a third straight deficit of near 10 percent of our entire economy. We used our stimulus money to save government jobs. They used theirs for bullet trains.

Time to see ourselves as others see us.
  • 0以资娱乐 2011-03-06 23:31 #62443
    Google pk Wolf
    “啊,将一些权力的礼物给我们看到其他人看我们自己,”写了诗人罗伯特彭斯。

    正如胡锦涛翅膀回家的路上,美国的威吓仍然在他的耳边响起,他一定在想,或许我们美国人应该停止讲课,并采取在自己仔细看看。

    您的货币升值,我们要求的中,停止运行费用由我方负担这些贸易盈余,开始实行自由贸易,放弃重商主义和保护主义的这些政策。

    但为什么呢?为什么要抛弃一个中国的贸易政策,正在为他们好得出奇,采取的贸易政策是失败的,我们沉闷?这是否有意义?

    为什么要任何国家效仿布什,克林顿,布什时代,剥夺了我们的制造业工作的三分之一,使我们为我们的国家生活的需要和借来的钱我们依赖于中国和世界的美国贸易政策的支付他们呢?

    中国为什么会,力求使自己的独立,自给自足的国家,采取一项政策,花费了我们我们的独立性?

    什么是他们的优势在地球上的第一力量,我们没有做我们的中国在干什么?

    米尔顿弗里德曼是我们的自由贸易主义者不知道它是如何,在19世纪的最后三分之一,我们留在英国的灰尘?难道他们不知道我们拥有了世界上最高的关税,以价格为建设新工厂生产的,我们当时从英国进口同样的商品超过了我们的市场和鞭策贪婪洋基英国产品?

    别忘了,美国人谁变成了工业奇迹,人类这个国家被称为“强盗资本家”。

    当他们把我们的崛起美国第一,中国是把中国第一。

    我们的大战略家要求知道为什么中国正在所有这些傲慢声称在南中国和东中国海的岛屿。他们告诉我们为什么要保持我们的航母了黄海和台湾海峡呢?谁做他们认为他们是谁?

    嗯,也许他们认为他们是19世纪的美国人。

    没有詹姆斯门罗和约翰昆西亚当斯brashly告诉欧洲大国保持我们半球呢?

    关于什么是中国,不是强加他们自己的门罗主义其他?正如历史学家沃尔特麦克杜格尔写道,奥托冯俾斯麦被视为侮辱了我们,因为我们是由中国,宣布门罗主义代表的“傲慢的美国特有的物种和不可原谅的。”

    胡锦涛登上他的人权记录从我们大发牢骚。停止对维吾尔族和藏族的压制。停止关押持不同政见者。让更多的互联网和新闻自由。

    但在回家的路上,胡锦涛必须在心里嘀咕着:谁是这些美国人教训我们?

    这难道不是同一个部落的奴役250年黑人和他们分开了一个世纪?这难道不是同一个部落的开走了他们土地上的印第安人,然后把它们贴在班图斯坦所有叫保留呢?这些不是历史上已经放弃对手无寸铁的城市只有人民原子弹?

    我们将如何反应,如果胡锦涛,而不是假装他不能听到关于人权问题的翻译,反驳道,“我们中国也关心我们所读的人权在阿布格莱布和关塔那摩的引渡,酷刑我们称之为\'水刑\'。“

    这不是写在了谁是有目的的,无情的很多中国共产党人防御,而是要表明,我们美国人不喜欢德怀特艾森豪威尔和肯尼迪自信的民族,是由野蛮和欺凌苏联尼基塔unintimidated再看看赫鲁晓夫。

    我们是在一个伟大斗争那时 - 也犹如我们能赢得胜利。

    但随着美国经济和撤退战略下沉,而中国增长10个百分点和放心猪鬃,我们似乎是一个牢骚大王的国家。他们吃我们的午餐,我们的声音就像是更衣室里的输家。

    我们要求中国更开放和包容的反对和异议。但是,当他们在美国民主的僵局来看,我们的政治鸡毛蒜皮的小事和我们政策的失败,而他们在国内移动和世界各地的是,他们为什么要成为像我们吗?

    有我们在本世纪美国资本主义的独裁表现为资本主义呢?一个是我们的政治表现,为我们大肆宣传民主对其一党制国家的优越性争论?

    我们不能赢或结束我们的战争,我们的预算平衡或控制我们的边界。如加利福尼亚州和伊利诺伊州的大国出现有关肚子去行动。美国政府正在运行的近10年我们整个经济的百分之三连胜的赤字。我们用我们刺激经济的资金来节省政府工作。他们用他们的子弹头列车。

    一次看到其他人看我们自己。
    支持 [b]粗体[/b] [img]图片地址[/img] [url]链接[/url]
    取消,返回帖子