滑铁卢华人, 水城百事论坛
+ 发帖 登录 注册
0

布坎南文章:How the Chinese Must See Us.美国的右派至少还有几个敢直话直说的,不象加州那些同性恋那么唧唧歪歪 〖热点〗

wolf 管理员 · 2011-03-06 11:32 · 2694 阅读 · #62355
http://buchanan.org/blog/how-the-chinese-must-see-us-4595

How the Chinese Must See Us
22 Jan

By Patrick J. Buchanan

“O would some power the gift to give us to see ourselves as others see us,” wrote the poet Robert Burns.

As Hu Jintao wings his way home, America’s hectoring still ringing in his ears, he must be thinking that maybe we Americans should stop lecturing them and take a closer look at ourselves.

Revalue your currency, we demand of the Chinese, stop running these trade surpluses at our expense, start practicing free trade, and abandon these mercantilist and protectionist policies.

But why should they? Why should China abandon a trade policy that is working marvelously well for them, and adopt a trade policy that is failing dismally for us? Does that make sense?

Why should any nation emulate the U.S. trade policy of the Bush-Clinton-Bush era that has stripped us of a third of our manufacturing jobs and made us dependent on China and the world for the needs of our national life and the borrowed money to pay for them?

Why would China, seeking to make herself an independent and self-sufficient nation, adopt a policy that cost us our independence?

And what are the Chinese doing in their ascendancy to first power on earth that we did not do in ours?

Are our Milton Friedmanite free-traders unaware of how it was that, in the last third of the 19th century, we left the British in the dust? Are they unaware we had the highest tariffs on earth to price British products out of our market and goad rapacious Yankees into building new factories to produce the same goods we were then importing from Great Britain?

Lest we forget, the Americans who turned this country into the industrial marvel of mankind were known as “Robber Barons.”

As they put America first in our rise, the Chinese are putting China first.

Our grand strategists demand to know why the Chinese are making these brash claims to all the islands in the South China and East China seas. Why are they telling us to keep our aircraft carriers out of the Yellow Sea and out of the Taiwan Strait? Who do they think they are?

Well, maybe they think they’re 19th-century Americans.

Did not James Monroe and John Quincy Adams brashly tell the great powers of Europe to stay out of our hemisphere?

What are the Chinese about, other than imposing a Monroe Doctrine of their own? As historian Walter McDougall writes, Otto von Bismarck was as affronted by us as we are by the Chinese, declaring that the Monroe Doctrine represented “a species of arrogance peculiarly American and inexcusable.”

Hu Jintao got an earful from us on his human rights records. Stop the repression of Uighurs and Tibetans. Stop jailing political dissidents. Allow more freedom of the Internet and the press.

But on his way home, Hu must be thinking to himself: Who are these Americans to lecture us?

Is this not the same tribe that enslaved black people for 250 years and segregated them for a century? Is this not the same tribe that drove the Indians off their lands, then stuck them all in Bantustans called reservations? Are these not the only people in history to have dropped atomic bombs on defenseless cities?

How would we have reacted if Hu, instead of pretending he couldn’t hear the translation of that question about human rights, retorted, “We Chinese are also concerned about what we read of human rights at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, of renditions, torture and something called ‘water-boarding.’”

This is not written in defense of the Chinese communists who are a purposeful and ruthless lot, but to suggest that we Americans no longer look like the self-confident nation of Dwight Eisenhower and JFK that was unintimidated by the brutal and bullying Soviet Union of Nikita Khrushchev.

We were in a great struggle then — and acted like we could win it.

But as America sinks economically and retreats strategically, while China grows at 10 percent and bristles with confidence, we appear to be a nation of whiners. They are eating our lunch, and we sound like losers in a locker room.

We demand that the Chinese be more open and tolerant of opposition and dissent. But when they look at the gridlock of American democracy, the pettiness of our politics and the failure of our policies, while they are on the move at home and all over the world, why should they want to be more like us?

Has our American capitalism in this century performed as well as their autocratic capitalism? Is our political performance an argument for the superiority of our ballyhooed democracy over their one-party state?

We can’t win or end our wars, balance our budgets or control our borders. Great states like California and Illinois appear about to go belly-up. The U.S. government is running a third straight deficit of near 10 percent of our entire economy. We used our stimulus money to save government jobs. They used theirs for bullet trains.

Time to see ourselves as others see us.
  • 0wolf 管理员 2011-03-06 22:01 (已编辑) #62425
    我乱翻译一部分,这活太累,先一小半吧
    中国人肯定是这样在看着我们

    \"啊,愿上天赐予我们能力,让我们能够象别人看我们一样地看到自己\"
    - 罗伯特 彭斯

    当胡锦涛飞在返程的路上,美国的训斥还回响在他耳朵里的时候,他一定
    在想,我们美国人应该停止教训他们,先看看我们自己。

    重新估价你们的货币,我们要求中国人说,停止用我们的消费来创造贸易
    盈余,开展自由贸易,放弃那些重商主义和保护主义的政策。

    但是为什么他们应该这么做?为什么中国应该放弃一个对他们来说奇迹般
    有效的贸易政策,来采用一个对我们来说已经彻底失败的贸易政策,这讲
    得通吗?

    对任何一个国家而言,他们有什么理由应该模仿布什-克林顿-布什时代的,
    使得我们失去了1/3的制造业工作让我们的国民生活依赖于中国和世界其
    他国家,让我们借钱来向他们付款的贸易政策?

    中国谋求自己成为一个独立的和自给自足的国家,他们有什么理由采用一
    个让我们失去独立性的政策?

    在中国崛起过程中,他们做的哪一件事我们在我们的崛起过程中没有做过?

    难道说我们那些倡导弗里德曼主义的自由贸易的人们不知道我们是怎样在
    19世纪最后的1/3超过英国的?难道他们不知道,我们当时使用了地球上最
    高的关税税率,使得英国进口的东西过于昂贵无法在市场销售,从而引诱了
    美国人去开工厂生产我们当时从英国进口的同一类产品?

    不要忘记,那些把美国变成世界工业奇迹的人被称为“强盗男爵”。

    我们在崛起的时候是以我们的利益为首,现在中国人也是以中国的利益为先。

    我们那些大战略家们要知道为什么中国人对东海和南海的岛屿提出了粗暴的
    领土要求,为什么他们要求我们不要把航母驶入黄海和台湾海峡?他们以为
    自己是谁?

    呃,他们大概觉得自己是十九世纪的美国人啊。

    难道说门罗和约翰亚当斯没有粗暴地告诉当时的欧洲强权,让他们不要进入
    我们的半球吗?

    中国人现在在做的,不就是他们自己版本的门罗主义吗?历史学家Walter
    McDougall写道,俾斯麦当年曾经被我们象中国今天对我们一样的冒犯,他
    宣称门罗主义代表了“一种美国式的令人无法忍受的傲慢”。

    【待续】
    支持 [b]粗体[/b] [img]图片地址[/img] [url]链接[/url]
    取消,返回帖子