<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>滑铁卢华人, 水城百事论坛</title>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/</link>
<description>水城社区-Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge &amp; Guelph华人的网上家园</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>选择有两个, 留/回去天朝, 告诉自己天朝遍地黄金, 然后努力工作养活公务员(的十分之一的养老金), 或者离开天朝, 不陪他们玩了. 我选了后者.</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 选择, Friday, August 23, 2013, 17:07:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210901</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210901</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>选择</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>国内精英已经意识到这个问题，估计短期内很难</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 19, Friday, August 23, 2013, 10:52:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210767</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210767</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:52:12 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>19</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>这个大家都理解。但不理解的是为什么有人多有人少，要先完善分配体制:-)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 3D, Friday, August 23, 2013, 10:50:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210765</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210765</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:50:26 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>3D</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>国内人太多了，现在的社会财富还不足以支撑一个完善的社保系统</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 要有时间, Friday, August 23, 2013, 10:39:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210753</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210753</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>要有时间</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>所以说投胎是技术活。</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 投到公务员家庭，就不用担心养老了。, Thursday, August 22, 2013, 13:33:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210515</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210515</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>投到公务员家庭，就不用担心养老了。</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>会正常说话吗？</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by @, Thursday, August 22, 2013, 13:20:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210510</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210510</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:20:01 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>@</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>已经解决了...公务员的...一个公务员的养老金能养10个农民/企业人员/社会人士....社会主义就是好,就是好, 灰常好!!</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by ..., Thursday, August 22, 2013, 13:16:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210506</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210506</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:16:19 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>...</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>两人负担４个老人，中国的老龄化将是最严重的</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 3D, Thursday, August 22, 2013, 13:15:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210505</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210505</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:15:13 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>3D</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>计划生育一家一个孩，可苦了儿女养老</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by Sunbird, Thursday, August 22, 2013, 13:11:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210502</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210502</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:11:10 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sunbird</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>中国社保还需要时间积累</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 一时半刻解决不了, Thursday, August 22, 2013, 13:08:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210499</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210499</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:08:51 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>一时半刻解决不了</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>中国机关事业单位的退休金还不错，企业就不行了。个体户农民可能就只能靠积蓄或儿女养老了，</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 3D, Thursday, August 22, 2013, 13:05:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210497</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210497</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:05:41 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>3D</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>加拿大养老整体不错，中国是有钱有权不错，老百姓差</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by Sunbird, Thursday, August 22, 2013, 12:59:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210493</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210493</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:59:07 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sunbird</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>那个CEO的养老一定比我们好。唉。</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 垒码, Thursday, August 22, 2013, 12:54:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210485</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210485</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>垒码</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>隨著加拿大人口老齡化加劇，本國支柱產業優勢減退，CPP已經叫急多年了。現在工作的人養著社會福利系統，誰知道30/40年後我們退休會是什麼光景呀。</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 風織利刃, Thursday, August 22, 2013, 12:27:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210462</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210462</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:27:45 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>風織利刃</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>对比中加的养老体系 孰优孰劣？ - http://www.popyard.com/cgi-mod/newspage.cgi?num=1559070&amp;r=0&amp;v=0&amp;j=0
- http://www.popyard.com/cgi-mod/newspage.cgi?num=1559115&amp;r=0&amp;v=0&amp;j=0</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Posting by vaseline, Thursday, August 22, 2013, 12:14:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210456</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=210456</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:14:17 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>vaseline</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>