滑铁卢华人, 水城百事论坛 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/ 水城社区-Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge & Guelph华人的网上家园 en 我媽媽呀，看到你的陳述，冷的一哆嗦呀。 Reply by 風織利刃, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 21:29:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213354 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213354 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 21:29:19 GMT 風織利刃 东航不是国内的吗？ Reply by ？, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 20:47:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213349 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213349 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:47:33 GMT ？ 小孩把手放进座位与电视屏幕之间，大人没看见，抱起小孩就站起，只有骨头连着，肉几乎断。 Reply by 我没见过这样的屏幕有空隙的，虽然能调角度, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 20:46:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213348 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213348 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:46:35 GMT 我没见过这样的屏幕有空隙的，虽然能调角度 很想知道飞机的哪个部件能达到这种效果。以后出行得当心了。 Reply by 姗姗来迟, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 14:57:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213321 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213321 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:57:16 GMT 姗姗来迟 你最擅长不看就回。 Reply by 航空公司不是慈善机构, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 11:33:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213293 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213293 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 11:33:04 GMT 航空公司不是慈善机构 新闻上说夹得很厉害，小孩有生命危险。死了赔得更多。 Reply by 航空公司不傻, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 11:31:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213292 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213292 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 11:31:51 GMT 航空公司不傻 你下次亲自测试下加航如何? Reply by 支持你, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 11:21:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213285 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213285 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 11:21:36 GMT 支持你 夹伤手指？真的有必要这么做吗？ Reply by 做事情也要考虑成本, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 09:48:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213256 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213256 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:48:34 GMT 做事情也要考虑成本 不会落到地面，但是烃类化合物的温室作用比二氧化碳高好几倍，而且可以导致光化学烟雾 Reply by ., Saturday, August 31, 2013, 09:41:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213254 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213254 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:41:26 GMT . 你的意思说不会造成任何环境污染吗？;-) Reply by 3D, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 08:25:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213236 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213236 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 08:25:07 GMT 3D 不知有几家航空公司能做到同样的亊 Reply by Sunbird, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 07:42:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213223 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213223 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 07:42:14 GMT Sunbird 放油是因为安全考虑，以免落地时发生爆炸 Reply by :-|, Saturday, August 31, 2013, 01:38:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213217 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213217 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 01:38:50 GMT :-| 文科生？灰鸡放油是必须的，因为降落时起落架不能承受那么大的重量。放油高度一般在2000米以上，这样油料就在空气中挥发了，为全球变暖做出重大贡献 Reply by ., Friday, August 30, 2013, 23:22:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213213 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213213 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 23:22:53 GMT . 试想一下如果事情发生在国内呢？ Reply by :-|, Friday, August 30, 2013, 16:56:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213162 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213162 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:56:20 GMT :-| 这空中放油怎么可能，造成多大污染啊 Reply by 3D, Friday, August 30, 2013, 16:56:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213161 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213161 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:56:06 GMT 3D 返航又不是迫降，為什麼要放油？是不是耗油60噸。 Reply by 風織利刃, Friday, August 30, 2013, 16:17:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213142 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213142 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:17:08 GMT 風織利刃 东航客机在起飞约90分钟后，机上一名2岁上海籍男童夹伤手指。医生建议机组决定返航墨尔本，机上300余名旅客全程表现出理解和配合，放油60吨损失40万元 Posting by 正能量, Friday, August 30, 2013, 15:39:

[ No text ]

]]> http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213135 http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=213135 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:39:05 GMT 正能量