<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>滑铁卢华人, 水城百事论坛</title>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/</link>
<description>水城社区-Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge &amp; Guelph华人的网上家园</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>同意，『兩害相權取其輕』，『真理再一次為無知犧牲』，幸好生活中少有這樣的抉擇。</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 風織利刃, Monday, July 15, 2013, 10:23:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199593</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199593</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>風織利刃</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>程序也不是一成不变的，管理者在不断完善，丰富它。做为执行者，就是要严格按照程序走，因为那就是最合理最有效率的</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 3D, Monday, July 15, 2013, 10:02:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199586</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199586</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:02:48 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>3D</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>墨守成规，怎么会有发展</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 12, Monday, July 15, 2013, 09:58:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199585</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199585</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:58:27 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>12</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>如果是制订好的科学程序，一定要按照程序走。那种违反程序，貌似很灵活的做法，不值得提倡</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 3D, Monday, July 15, 2013, 09:57:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199584</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199584</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:57:32 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>3D</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>就和这里的医生一样</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 55, Monday, July 15, 2013, 09:23:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199558</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199558</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:23:03 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>55</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>基本这样。程序正确优于其他。因此在大公司工作，一定不要违反程序。做不成没有关系（虽然成本很高）。</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 呵呵, Monday, July 15, 2013, 09:19:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199554</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199554</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:19:36 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>呵呵</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>会不会是：压死一个属于故意杀人，会吃官司的，压死九个属于意外事故，不需要负法律责任</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by andrew, Monday, July 15, 2013, 09:15:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199546</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199546</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:15:05 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>可能没有办法选择，只能牺牲一个小孩。我们学First Aid的时候，如果发现两个人同时受重伤，先就伤势稍轻的那个</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 答案是显然的, Monday, July 15, 2013, 09:11:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199544</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199544</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:11:51 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>答案是显然的</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trolley problem：有二条铁轨，一条新的，一条旧的。 有了新铁轨后，旧铁轨不再有火车通过，有一天有十个小孩到铁轨上玩耍，九个小孩在新铁轨上玩，其中有一个小孩在旧铁轨上玩，并提醒九个玩伴：新铁轨不安全，还是到旧铁轨上玩吧，但九个小孩没有听一个小孩劝告，仍然在新铁轨上玩，突然一列火车开来，这时扳道工要作决定，火车一直开要压死九个小孩，但扳道到旧铁轨上只压死一个小孩。 如果你是扳道工，你怎么决定? 说出理由。</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Posting by andrew, Monday, July 15, 2013, 09:08:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199542</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=199542</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>